ArticleEMBO reports2020
Real-time ethics engagement in biomedical research: Ethics from bench to bedside.
Article in EMBO reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Organoids: a systematic review of ethical issues.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022Pooled it
- Operationalising a real-time research ethics approach: supporting ethical mindfulness in agriculture-nutrition-health research in Malawi.BMC medical ethics · 2022Trial
- How to embed ethics into laboratory research.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- Electrical and Magnetic Neuromodulation Technologies and Brain-Computer Interfaces: Ethical Considerations for Enhancement of Brain Function in Healthy People - A Systematic Scoping Review.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Ensuring safety and efficacy in combination products: regulatory challenges and best practices.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Review
- The science behind soft skills: Do's and Don'ts for early career researchers and beyond. A review paper from the EU-CardioRNA COST Action CA17129.Open research Europe · 2023Article
- Educating for Responsible Research Practice in Biomedical Sciences: Towards Learning Goals.Science & education · 2022Article
- Optimizing Ethics Engagement in Research: Learning from the Ethical Complexities of Studying Opioid Use in Pregnancy.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2022Article
- Article
- Thinking "ethical" when designing an international, cross-disciplinary biomedical research consortium.The EMBO journal · 2020Article
- Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Real-time ethics engagement in biomedical research: Ethics from bench to bedside.EMBO reports · 2020Article
- Fostering Neuroethics Integration with Neuroscience in the BRAIN Initiative: Comments on the NIH Neuroethics Roadmap.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical research often raises ethical questions that are usually addressed ad hoc or in retrospective. Real-time ethical engagement as part of research may be better suited to identify ethical issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.