Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31944537›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2020

Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration.

Vanessa Vargas-Nguyen, R Heath Kelsey, Harald Jordahl, William Nuttle, Charles Somerville, Jane Thomas, William C Dennison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vanessa Vargas-NguyenUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-5837
R Heath KelseyUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0724-393X
Harald JordahlAmerica's Watershed Initiative, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
William NuttleUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, Maryland, USA.
Charles SomervilleCollege of Science, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, USA.
Jane ThomasUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, Maryland, USA.
William C DennisonUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Caterpillar FoundationIngram Barge CompanyMcKnight FoundationNature Conservancy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of developing a socioenvironmental report card through transdisciplinary collaboration can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collaborative solutions for sustainable resource management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors. We demonstrated this in the Mississippi River watershed, USA with the ultimate goal of promoting holistic management of the region's natural resources. But working at the scale of the Mississippi River watershed presents the challenge of working across geographical, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. The development of a socioenvironmental report card served as the focus for efforts to foster a shared vision among diverse stakeholders in the watershed and to promote transdisciplinary collaboration. The process engaged more than 700 participants from environment, flood control, transportation, water supply, economy, and recreation sectors, from more than 400 organizations representing local, state, and federal government agencies, businesses and trade associations, and private, nonprofit, and academic institutions. This broad engagement in the selection of important themes, indicators, measures, and assessment methods as part of the cocreation of boundary objects aimed to foster social and mutual learning and to develop common understanding and shared visioning among stakeholders with differing perspectives. The process was facilitated by boundary-spanning organizations, creating an atmosphere of trust by utilizing "third places" for knowledge exchange and integration. This transdisciplinary process also led to collective action through collaboration and selection of restoration and management activities that could improve conditions for multiple sectors simultaneously and/or recognize potential tradeoffs for informed decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:494-507. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

EcotoxicologyWater SupplyEconomicsSocial ConditionsIntegrated managementMississippi RiverReport cardSocioenvironmentalTransdisciplinary collaboration

Identifiers

PMID31944537
PMCPMC7317921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.