Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31944486›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Impact of opioid dose escalation on the development of substance use disorders, accidents, self-inflicted injuries, opioid overdoses and alcohol and non-opioid drug-related overdoses: a retrospective cohort study.

Corey J Hayes, Erin E Krebs, Teresa Hudson, Joshua Brown, Chenghui Li, Bradley C Martin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patching holes in the mechanism of opioid tolerance.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Corey J HayesDivision of Health Services Research, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7776-6157
Erin E KrebsCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Teresa HudsonDivision of Health Services Research, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Joshua BrownCenter for Drug Evaluation and Safety, Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, USA.
Chenghui LiDivision of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Bradley C MartinDivision of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8402-3098
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · USMinneapolis VA Health Care System · US

Funding

Translational Training in AddictionT32DA022981 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Melissa Jean Zielinski · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
Impact of Opioid Dosing Strategies on Pain Scores and Adverse or Unintended Clinical OutcomesR36DA046717 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI HAYES, COREY J · 2018 to 2018
$54k
NIDA NIH HHS R36 DA046717NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA022981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo understand the potential harmful effects of dose escalation among patients with chronic, non-cancer pain (CNCP) on chronic opioid therapy.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingUnited States Veterans Healthcare Administration.

participantsVeterans with CNCP and on chronic opioid therapy were identified using data from fiscal years 2008-15. The Veteran sample was approximately 90% male and 70% white. MEASUREMENTS: Dose escalators [increase of > 20% average morphine milligram equivalent (MME) daily dose] were compared with dose maintainers (change of ±20% average MME daily dose). A composite measure of subsequent substance use disorders (SUDs: opioid, non-opioid and alcohol use disorders) and opioid-related adverse outcomes (AOs: accidents resulting in wounds/injuries, opioid-related and alcohol and non-opioid medication-related accidents and overdoses, self-inflicted injuries) as well as the individual SUDs and AOs was examined. The primary analyses were conducted among a 1 : 1 matched sample of escalators and maintainers matched on propensity score and index date. Propensity scores were generated using demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, medication and health-care utilization characteristics. Subgroup analyses were conducted by quartile of the propensity score. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using adjusted logistic regression, logistic regression using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) and instrumental variable (IV) models using geographic variation in opioid dose escalation as the IV.

findingsThere were 32 420 maintainers and 20 767 escalators resulting in 19 358 (93.2%) matched pairs. Composite AOs [odds ratio (OR) = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.23, 1.40], composite SUDs (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.22, 1.41) and individual SUD and AO subtypes were higher among dose escalators, except for opioid-related accidents and overdoses and violence-related injuries. Subgroup analyses within the propensity score quartiles found similar results. Sensitivity analyses with the adjusted and SIPTW logistic regressions found similar results to the primary analyses for all outcomes except for opioid-related accidents and overdoses, which were found to be significantly higher among escalators. Sensitivity analyses with IV models provided mixed results with SUDs and the individual types of AOs.

conclusionEscalating the opioid dose for those with chronic, non-cancer pain is associated with increased risks of substance use disorder and opioid-related adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Accidental InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedAlcoholismAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainCohort StudiesDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioOpiate OverdoseRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidAdverse outcomeschronic paindose escalationopioidsoverdosesubstance use disordersVeterans Administration

Identifiers

PMID31944486
PMCPMC7263736
OpenAlexW3000728480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.