Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31944367›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2020

Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Eva Hollemans, Esther I Verhoef, Chris H Bangma, John Rietbergen, Monique J Roobol, Jozien Helleman, Geert J L H van Leenders

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva HollemansDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2406-5370
Esther I VerhoefDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-0254
Chris H BangmaDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John RietbergenDepartment of Urology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-1708
Jozien HellemanDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0641-0524
Geert J L H van LeendersDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2176-9102

Funding

Jaap Schouten Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsInvasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma are associated with aggressive disease in Grade Group 2 (GG2) prostate cancer patients. However, the characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with GG2 prostate cancer without cribriform architecture (GG2-) as compared with those with Grade Group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of GG1 and GG2- prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens. METHODS AND

resultsWe reviewed 835 radical prostatectomy specimens for Grade Group, pT stage, surgical margin status, and the presence of cribriform architecture. Biochemical recurrence-free survival and metastasis were used as clinical outcomes. GG1 prostate cancer was seen in 207 patients, and GG2 prostate cancer was seen in 420 patients, of whom 228 (54%) showed cribriform architecture (GG2+) and 192 (46%) did not. GG2- patients had higher prostate-specific antigen levels (9.4 ng/ml versus 7.0 ng/ml; P < 0.001), more often had extraprostatic extension (36% versus 11%; P < 0.001) and had more positive surgical margins (27% versus 17%; P = 0.01) than GG1 patients. GG2- patients had shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.9; P = 0.002) than GG1 patients. Lymph node and distant metastasis were observed neither in GG2- nor in GG1 patients, but occurred in 22 of 228 (10%) GG2+ patients.

conclusionIn conclusion, patients with GG2- prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy have more advanced disease and shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival than those with GG1 prostate cancer, but both groups have a very low risk of developing metastasis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstatectomyProstatic Neoplasmscribriformintraductal carcinomaprognosisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID31944367
PMCPMC7216977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.