ArticleHistopathology2020
Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Article in Histopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of biopsy gleason pattern 4 percentage and length in grade group 2 prostate cancer patients.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Cribriform Tumor Burden in Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer: A Quantitative Threshold Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion and Metastasis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Classification of prostatic adenocarcinoma as favourable/unfavourable histology has high interobserver agreement in prostate needle core biopsies.Histopathology · 2025Article
- Pathological Assessment of Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Is cribriform pattern in prostate biopsy a risk factor for metastatic disease onWorld journal of urology · 2023Article
- Review
- Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate as a Cause of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: A Molecular Portrait.Cancers · 2022Review
- Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients.Histopathology · 2022Article
- Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021Article
- Diagnosis of "cribriform" prostatic adenocarcinoma: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists with recommendations.American journal of cancer research · 2021Article
- Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading.Histopathology · 2020Review
- Article
- Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.Histopathology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsInvasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma are associated with aggressive disease in Grade Group 2 (GG2) prostate cancer patients. However, the characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with GG2 prostate cancer without cribriform architecture (GG2-) as compared with those with Grade Group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of GG1 and GG2- prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens. METHODS AND
resultsWe reviewed 835 radical prostatectomy specimens for Grade Group, pT stage, surgical margin status, and the presence of cribriform architecture. Biochemical recurrence-free survival and metastasis were used as clinical outcomes. GG1 prostate cancer was seen in 207 patients, and GG2 prostate cancer was seen in 420 patients, of whom 228 (54%) showed cribriform architecture (GG2+) and 192 (46%) did not. GG2- patients had higher prostate-specific antigen levels (9.4 ng/ml versus 7.0 ng/ml; P < 0.001), more often had extraprostatic extension (36% versus 11%; P < 0.001) and had more positive surgical margins (27% versus 17%; P = 0.01) than GG1 patients. GG2- patients had shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.9; P = 0.002) than GG1 patients. Lymph node and distant metastasis were observed neither in GG2- nor in GG1 patients, but occurred in 22 of 228 (10%) GG2+ patients.
conclusionIn conclusion, patients with GG2- prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy have more advanced disease and shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival than those with GG1 prostate cancer, but both groups have a very low risk of developing metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.