Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31944364›Full record

ArticleBioelectromagnetics2020

Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using 3D Magnetic Scaffolds.

Alyaa I Aldebs, Fatema T Zohora, Nasim Nosoudi, Surinder P Singh, Jaime E Ramirez-Vick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectromagnetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Anti-Oxidative and Immune Regulatory Responses of THP-1 and PBMC to Pulsed EMF Are Field-Strength Dependent.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biophysical Stimuli as the Fourth Pillar of Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alyaa I AldebsDepartment of Biomedical, Industrial & Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.
Fatema T ZohoraDepartment of Biomedical, Industrial & Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.
Nasim NosoudiBiomedical Engineering Program, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia.
Surinder P SinghCSIR-National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, India.
Jaime E Ramirez-VickDepartment of Biomedical, Industrial & Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9845-3734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative bone regeneration strategies that do not rely on harvested tissue or exogenous growth factors are needed. One of the major challenges in tissue reconstruction is recreating the bone tissue microenvironment using the appropriate combination of cells, scaffold, and stimulation to direct differentiation. This study presents a bone regeneration formulation that involves the use of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASCs) and a three-dimensional (3D) hydrogel scaffold based on self-assembled RADA16 peptides containing superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (NPs). Although superparamagnetic NPs could be used as stimulus to manipulate the cell proliferation and differentiation, in this paper their use is explored for assisting osteogenic differentiation of hASCs in conjunction with direct stimulation by extremely low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (pEMFs). Cellular morphology, proliferation, and viability, as well as alkaline phosphatase activity, calcium deposition, and osteogenic capacity were monitored for cells cultured up to 21 days in the 3D construct. The results show that the pEMFs and NPs do not have any negative effect on cell viability, but instead distinctly induced early differentiation of hASCs to an osteoblastic phenotype, when compared with cells without biophysical stimulation. This effect is attributed to synergy between the pEMFs and NPs, which may have stimulated mechanotransduction pathways, which, in turn activated biochemical signals between cells to differentiate or proliferate. This approach may offer a safe and effective option for the treatment of non-union bone fractures. Bioelectromagnetics. © 2020 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsTissue ScaffoldsAlkaline PhosphataseBone RegenerationCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedHumansHydrogelsMagnetic Iron Oxide NanoparticlesMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteoblastsOsteogenesisPeptidesAlkaline PhosphataseHydrogelsPeptidesRADA16-I3D tissue constructselectromagnetic stimulationiron oxide nanoparticlesmagnetic scaffoldsmesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31944364
PMCPMC9290550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.