Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31944236›Full record

ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2020

Increased Colonic Epithelial Permeability and Mucosal Eosinophilia in Ulcerative Colitis in Remission Compared With Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Health.

Georgios Katinios, Maite Casado-Bedmar, Susanna A Walter, Maria Vicario, Ana M González-Castro, Olga Bednarska, Johan D Söderholm, Henrik Hjortswang, Åsa V Keita

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. ReFermFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Emerging functions of tissue-resident eosinophils.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Genes & diseases · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgios KatiniosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maite Casado-BedmarDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Susanna A WalterDepartment of Gastroenterology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria VicarioLaboratory of Translational Mucosal Immunology, Digestive Diseases Research Unit. Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana M González-CastroLaboratory of Translational Mucosal Immunology, Digestive Diseases Research Unit. Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Olga BednarskaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan D SöderholmDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Henrik HjortswangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Åsa V KeitaDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarrier dysfunction is recognized as a pathogenic factor in ulcerative colitis (UC) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but it is unclear to what extent the factors related to barrier dysfunction are disease-specific. The aim of this study was to compare these aspects in UC patients in remission, IBS patients, and healthy controls (HCs).

methodsColonic biopsies were collected from 13 patients with UC in remission, 15 patients with IBS-mixed, and 15 HCs. Ulcerative colitis patients had recently been treated for relapse, and biopsies were taken from earlier inflamed areas. Biopsies were mounted in Ussing chambers for measurements of intestinal paracellular permeability to 51chromium (Cr)-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). In addition, biopsies were analyzed for mast cells and eosinophils by histological procedures, and plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α was assessed by ELISA.

resultsUssing chamber experiments revealed an increased 51Cr-EDTA permeability in UC and IBS (P < 0.05). The 51Cr-EDTA permeability was higher in UC compared with IBS (P < 0.005). There were increased numbers of mucosal mast cells and eosinophils in UC and IBS and more eosinophils in UC compared with IBS (P < 0.05). Also, increased extracellular granule content was found in UC compared with HCs (P < 0.05). The 51Cr-EDTA permeability correlated significantly with eosinophils in all groups. Plasma TNF-α concentration was higher in UC compared with IBS and HCs (P < 0.0005).

conclusionsResults indicate a more permeable intestinal epithelium in inactive UC and IBS compared with HCs. Ulcerative colitis patients, even during remission, demonstrate a leakier barrier compared with IBS. Both eosinophil numbers and activation state might be involved in the increased barrier function seen in UC patients in remission.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsyCase-Control StudiesColitis, UlcerativeColonEosinophiliaFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedPermeabilityRemission InductionYoung Adulteosinophilsintestinal permeabilityirritable bowel syndromemast cellsulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID31944236
PMCPMC7301402
OpenAlexW3000123938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.