ArticleCancer medicine2020
A population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Drug Delivery Approaches for the Localized Treatment of Cervical Cancer.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Sex and smoking differences in the association between gastroesophageal reflux and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a high-incidence area: Golestan Cohort Study.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Association between common vaginal and HPV infections and results of cytology test in the Zhoupu District, Shanghai City, China, from 2014 to 2019.Virology journal · 2022Article
- Characteristics of aerobic vaginitis among women in Xi'an district: a hospital-based study.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- A population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between vaginal pH and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is unclear. We evaluated the dose-response relationship between vaginal pH and CIN risk, as well as the combined influence of vaginal pH and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) on the risk of CIN and the mediation effects of hrHPV infection on vaginal pH level and the development of CIN. We investigated 2304 women in Shanxi, China. The dose-response relationship between vaginal pH and CIN risk was assessed using categoric and spline analyses. We established interaction and mediation models to determine the correlation between pH and hrHPV in the development of CIN. After adjusting covariates, a positive association was observed between hrHPV infection and the development of CIN [OR (95% CI) = 4.75 (3.52-6.40) for CIN2+; OR (95% CI) = 7.30 (4.10-13.00) for CIN3+], while a negative correlation was showed between vaginal pH level and CIN3+ [OR (95% CI) = 1.04 (0.59-1.84); high vs low: OR (95% CI) = 0.32 (0.15-0.69), P = .002]. The highest risk of CIN (5.24 of CIN2+ and 5.80 of CIN3+) were observed when hrHPV infection was combined with middle vaginal pH (4.6-5.0). A significant mediation effect of hrHPV infection was observed in the association between vaginal pH level with CIN2+ (P = .002) and CIN3+ (P = .004). In conclusion, abnormal vaginal pH significantly induced the risk of high-stage CIN in Chinese women infected with hrHPV. Therefore, maintaining normal vaginal pH levels may reduce the risk of CIN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.