Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31943682›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2020

Outcomes of completion total mesorectal excision are not compromised by prior transanal minimally invasive surgery.

S H E M Clermonts, T Köeter, H Pottel, L P S Stassen, D K Wasowicz, D D E Zimmerman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Completion Total Mesorectal Excision: A Case-Matched Comparison With Primary Resection.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S H E M ClermontsDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden) Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5880-2992
T KöeterDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden) Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
H PottelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Catholic University Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium.
L P S StassenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
D K WasowiczDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden) Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
D D E ZimmermanDepartment of Surgery, ETZ (Elisabeth-TweeSteden) Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0393-9350
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTransanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is used increasingly often as an organ-preserving treatment for early rectal cancer. If final pathology reveals unfavourable histological prognostic features, completion total mesorectal excision (cTME) is recommended. This study is the first to investigate the results of cTME after TAMIS.

methodData were retrieved from the prospective database of the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital. Completion TME patients were case matched with a control group of patients undergoing primary TME (pTME). Primary and secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes and oncological outcomes, respectively.

resultsFrom 2011 to 2017, 20 patients underwent cTME and were compared with 40 patients undergoing pTME. There were no significant differences in operating time (238 min vs 226 min, P = 0.53), blood loss (137 ml vs. 158 ml, P = 0.88) or complications (45% vs 55%, P = 0.07) between both groups. There was no 90-day mortality in the cTME group. The mesorectal fascia was incomplete in three patients (15%) in the cTME group compared with no breaches in the pTME group (P = 0.083). There were no local recurrences in either group. In three patients (15%), distant metastases were detected after cTME compared with one patient (2.5%) in the pTME group (P = 0.069). After cTME patients had a 1- and 5-year disease-free survival of 85% compared with 97.5% for the pTME group (P = 0.062).

conclusionCompletion TME surgery after TAMIS is not associated with increased peri- or postoperative morbidity or mortality compared with pTME surgery. After cTME surgery patients have a similar disease-free and overall survival when compared with patients undergoing pTME.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment Outcomecompletionorgan preservationTEMSTransanal minimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID31943682
PMCPMC7497048
OpenAlexW2999293627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.