Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31943190›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

Outcomes of primary care delivery by nurse practitioners: Utilization, cost, and quality of care.

Chuan-Fen Liu, Paul L Hebert, Jamie H Douglas, Emily L Neely, Christine A Sulc, Ashok Reddy, Anne E Sales, Edwin S Wong

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Staff Experiences with the Implementation of Nurse Practitioner (NP)-led Clinics in New Brunswick, Canada.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chuan-Fen LiuDepartment of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-6915-8194
Paul L HebertDepartment of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-5886-7964
Jamie H DouglasCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Emily L NeelyCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Christine A SulcCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Ashok ReddyCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-629X
Anne E SalesCenter of Innovation for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Edwin S WongDepartment of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-6079-686X
University of Washington · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether nurse practitioner (NP)-assigned patients exhibited differences in utilization, costs, and clinical outcomes compared to medical doctor (MD)-assigned patients. DATA SOURCES: Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data capturing characteristics, outcomes, and provider assignments of 806 434 VA patients assigned to an MD primary care provider (PCP) who left VA practice between 2010 and 2012. STUDY

designWe applied a difference-in-difference approach comparing outcomes between patients reassigned to MD and NP PCPs, respectively. We examined measures of outpatient (primary care, specialty care, and mental health) and inpatient (total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations) utilization, costs (outpatient, inpatient and total), and clinical outcomes (control of hemoglobin A1c, LDL, and blood pressure) in the year following reassignment. PRINCIPAL

findingsCompared to MD-assigned patients, NP-assigned patients were less likely to use primary care and specialty care services and incurred fewer total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations. Differences in costs, clinical outcomes, and receipt of diagnostic tests between groups were not statistically significant.

conclusionsPatients reassigned to NPs experienced similar outcomes and incurred less utilization at comparable cost relative to MD patients. NPs may offer a cost-effective approach to addressing anticipated shortages of primary care physicians.

Indexed as

AdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary MedicineNurse PractitionersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareUnited Statescosthealth workforcenurse practitionerprimary carequality of careutilization

Identifiers

PMID31943190
PMCPMC7080399
OpenAlexW3000032401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.