Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31943168›Full record

Trial reportCancer2020

Nab-paclitaxel in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have developed disease progression after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

Jared M Weiss, Nathan Pennell, Allison M Deal, Daniel Morgensztern, Daniel S Bradford, Jeffrey Crane, Howard Jack West, Carrie Lee, Chad Pecot, James P Stevenson and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Measuring Biologic Resilience in Older Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Jared M WeissDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2961-4447
Nathan PennellHematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Allison M DealDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Daniel MorgenszternOncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Daniel S BradfordHighlands Oncology, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Jeffrey CraneRex Hematology Oncology Associates, Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina.
Howard Jack WestDepartment of Medical Oncology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Carrie LeeDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Chad PecotDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
James P StevensonHematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
William IrvinMedical Oncology, Bon Secours, Midlothian, Virginia.
Mark SocinskiFlorida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida.
Tom StinchcombeDivision of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-8011
Liza C VillaruzDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Hyman B MussDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCleveland Clinic · USBon Secours Health System · USDuke Medical Center · USFlorida Hospital Cancer Institute · USHighlands Oncology Group · USRex Hospital · USSwedish Medical Center · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe selection of later-line treatment for older patients with AJCC (version 7) stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel is approved with carboplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC and subgroup analysis of phase 3 data has suggested superior survival in older patients.

methodsThe authors conducted a phase 2 study of nab-paclitaxel in 42 patients aged ≥70 years who had been treated previously with a platinum doublet regimen; patients also could have received a PD-1 inhibitor. The primary endpoint of the current study was grade 3 to 5 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). In addition to response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), geriatric assessments also were performed before and during treatment, associations between baseline sarcopenia and outcomes were explored, and changes in T lymphocyte p16 before and during treatment were measured. The authors also performed a retrospective subgroup analysis of 19 older patients who were treated with nab-paclitaxel as part of a larger, randomized, phase 2 study; data were not combined.

resultsThe rate of grade 3 to 5 toxicities was 33.7%. The most common grade 3 to 5 toxicities were decreased white blood cell count (11.9%), neutropenia (9.5%), and fatigue (11.9%). The response rate was 34.2% (2.6% complete response rate and 31.6% partial response rate). The median PFS was 5.2 months and the median OS was 9.3 months. Adverse prognostic factors were common: 42% of patients were frail and 39% of patients were prefrail, whereas 21% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 and 27% were sarcopenic. Only frailty was found to be predictive of inferior survival. A subgroup analysis of 19 older patients treated with nab-paclitaxel alone in a prior trial demonstrated a response rate of 15.8%, a PFS of 4.2 months, and an OS of 13.6 months.

conclusionsFit and prefrail older patients with stage IV NSCLC should be considered for treatment with nab-paclitaxel after disease progression with doublet chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdenocarcinoma of LungAgedAged, 80 and overAlbuminsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMalePaclitaxelPlatinumPrognosis130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsPaclitaxelPlatinumelderlygeriatric assessmentlymphocyte p16nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxelnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)sarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID31943168
OpenAlexW3000313458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.