Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31943070›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

DNA targeting by Clostridium cellulolyticum CRISPR-Cas9 Type II-C system.

Iana Fedorova, Anatolii Arseniev, Polina Selkova, Georgii Pobegalov, Ignatiy Goryanin, Aleksandra Vasileva, Olga Musharova, Marina Abramova, Maksim Kazalov, Tatyana Zyubko and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Optimization of CRISPR-Cas system for clinical cancer therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Versatile and efficient in vivo genome editing with compact Streptococcus pasteurianus Cas9.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Iana FedorovaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Anatolii ArsenievPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Polina SelkovaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Georgii PobegalovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ignatiy GoryaninSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Aleksandra VasilevaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Olga MusharovaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Marina AbramovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Maksim KazalovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Tatyana ZyubkoSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Tatyana ArtamonovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Daria ArtamonovaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Sergey ShmakovSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Mikhail KhodorkovskiiPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Konstantin SeverinovSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center of life sciences, Skolkovo, Russia.
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RUPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type II CRISPR-Cas9 RNA-guided nucleases are widely used for genome engineering. Type II-A SpCas9 protein from Streptococcus pyogenes is the most investigated and highly used enzyme of its class. Nevertheless, it has some drawbacks, including a relatively big size, imperfect specificity and restriction to DNA targets flanked by an NGG PAM sequence. Cas9 orthologs from other bacterial species may provide a rich and largely untapped source of biochemical diversity, which can help to overcome the limitations of SpCas9. Here, we characterize CcCas9, a Type II-C CRISPR nuclease from Clostridium cellulolyticum H10. We show that CcCas9 is an active endonuclease of comparatively small size that recognizes a novel two-nucleotide PAM sequence. The CcCas9 can potentially broaden the existing scope of biotechnological applications of Cas9 nucleases and may be particularly advantageous for genome editing of C. cellulolyticum H10, a bacterium considered to be a promising biofuel producer.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsCrystallography, X-RayDNAGene EditingMutationNucleotide MotifsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRuminiclostridium cellulolyticumStreptococcus pyogenesSubstrate SpecificityCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNARNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID31943070
PMCPMC7038990
OpenAlexW3000570028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.