Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31943053›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2020

Dietary phytoestrogen intakes of adult women are not strongly related to fecundability in 2 preconception cohort studies.

Amelia K Wesselink, Elizabeth E Hatch, Ellen M Mikkelsen, Ellen Trolle, Sydney K Willis, Susan E McCann, Liisa Valsta, Annamari Lundqvist, Katherine L Tucker, Kenneth J Rothman and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of a nutrition screening tool to identify need for dietetic intervention in female infertility.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Amelia K WesselinkDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth E HatchDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ellen M MikkelsenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ellen TrolleDivision of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Sydney K WillisDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Susan E McCannRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Liisa ValstaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Annamari LundqvistFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Katherine L TuckerZuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA.
Kenneth J RothmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauren A WiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIAarhus University Hospital · DKRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

An internet-based preconception cohort study in North America and DenmarkR01HD086742 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LAUREN A WISE · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
An internet based prospective study of time to pregnancyR01HD060680 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI HATCH, ELIZABETH E · 2010 to 2014
$2.6M
A Pilot Study Of Internet Recruitment and follow-up among Reproductive Age WomenR21HD050264 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI HATCH, ELIZABETH E · 2006 to 2007
$399k
Feasibility of an internet-based study of time-to-pregnancy in the United StatesR21HD072326 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WISE, LAUREN A · 2013 to 2014
$337k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060680NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086742NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD050264NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD072326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhytoestrogens are plant-derived hormonally active compounds found in soy, cruciferous vegetables, nuts, and seeds. Although phytoestrogens have been associated with altered endogenous hormonal activity, luteal phase deficiency, and reduced endometrial decidualization, the literature reporting examinations of phytoestrogen intake and fertility presents mixed findings.

objectivesWe sought to evaluate prospectively the association between dietary phytoestrogen intake (isoflavones, lignans, and coumestans) and fecundability, the per-cycle probability of conception, in 2 cohorts of women planning pregnancy.

methodsPregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) and Snart Foraeldre (SF) are parallel web-based preconception cohort studies of women from North America and Denmark, respectively, who are trying to conceive. Participants complete an online baseline questionnaire on sociodemographic, lifestyle, and medical factors. We ascertained intake of individual phytoestrogens from validated FFQs. We measured fecundability using data on menstruation and pregnancy status from bimonthly follow-up questionnaires. We analyzed data from 4880 PRESTO and 2898 SF female study participants who had been attempting conception for ≤6 cycles at study entry. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% CIs.

resultsPhytoestrogen intake varied across cohorts, yet was associated with higher socioeconomic status and healthier behaviors in both cohorts. After adjustment for potential confounders, phytoestrogen intake was not substantially associated with fecundability in either cohort. We observed some evidence of improved fecundability with increasing isoflavone intake among women age ≥30 years in PRESTO (FR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.34, for comparison of ≥90th with <25th percentile intake) and SF (corresponding FR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.55). Lignan intake was associated with slightly increased fecundability in SF (FR for comparison of 75th to 90th with <25th percentile: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.26), but decreased fecundability in PRESTO (FR for comparison of ≥90th with <25th percentile: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.97).

conclusionsWe did not observe strong associations between phytoestrogen intake and prospectively-measured fecundability among North American or Danish pregnancy planners.

Indexed as

DietAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesCoumarinsDenmarkEducational StatusFemaleFertilityFertilizationHumansIncomeIsoflavonesLignansNorth AmericaPhytoestrogensCoumarinscoumestanIsoflavonesLignansPhytoestrogensfecundabilityisoflavoneslignansphytoestrogenspreconceptiontime to pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31943053
PMCPMC7198303
OpenAlexW3000099758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.