Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31943012›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

medExtractR: A targeted, customizable approach to medication extraction from electronic health records.

Hannah L Weeks, Cole Beck, Elizabeth McNeer, Michael L Williams, Cosmin A Bejan, Joshua C Denny, Leena Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rising Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Pharmacometrics and Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatrics.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DrugWAS: Drug-wide Association Studies for COVID-19 Drug Repurposing.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah L WeeksDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Cole BeckDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Elizabeth McNeerDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Michael L WilliamsDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Cosmin A BejanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Joshua C DennyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Leena ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002244 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Julie A. Bastarache · 2017 to 2026
$4.6M
System construction for population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling using electronic health records: toward precision medicineR01GM124109 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHOI, LEENA · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002244NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe developed medExtractR, a natural language processing system to extract medication information from clinical notes. Using a targeted approach, medExtractR focuses on individual drugs to facilitate creation of medication-specific research datasets from electronic health records. MATERIALS AND

methodsWritten using the R programming language, medExtractR combines lexicon dictionaries and regular expressions to identify relevant medication entities (eg, drug name, strength, frequency). MedExtractR was developed on notes from Vanderbilt University Medical Center, using medications prescribed with varying complexity. We evaluated medExtractR and compared it with 3 existing systems: MedEx, MedXN, and CLAMP (Clinical Language Annotation, Modeling, and Processing). We also demonstrated how medExtractR can be easily tuned for better performance on an outside dataset using the MIMIC-III (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III) database.

resultsOn 50 test notes per development drug and 110 test notes for an additional drug, medExtractR achieved high overall performance (F-measures >0.95), exceeding performance of the 3 existing systems across all drugs. MedExtractR achieved the highest F-measure for each individual entity, except drug name and dose amount for allopurinol. With tuning and customization, medExtractR achieved F-measures >0.90 in the MIMIC-III dataset. DISCUSSION: The medExtractR system successfully extracted entities for medications of interest. High performance in entity-level extraction provides a strong foundation for developing robust research datasets for pharmacological research. When working with new datasets, medExtractR should be tuned on a small sample of notes before being broadly applied.

conclusionsThe medExtractR system achieved high performance extracting specific medications from clinical text, leading to higher-quality research datasets for drug-related studies than some existing general-purpose medication extraction tools.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingPharmaceutical PreparationsSoftwareData MiningDatasets as TopicDrug TherapyHumansProgramming LanguagesPharmaceutical Preparationsmedication extractionmedication population studynatural language processingreal world data

Identifiers

PMID31943012
PMCPMC7025369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.