Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31942938›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2020

Modelling brain development to detect white matter injury in term and preterm born neonates.

Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh, Emma C Robinson, Maximillian Pietsch, Thomas Wolfers, Paul Aljabar, Lucilio Cordero Grande, Rui P A G Teixeira, Jelena Bozek, Andreas Schuh, Antonios Makropoulos and 13 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Expert consensus on the clinical practice of neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Jonathan O'MuircheartaighDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Emma C RobinsonCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Maximillian PietschCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Thomas WolfersDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Paul AljabarCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Lucilio Cordero GrandeCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Rui P A G TeixeiraCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Jelena BozekFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Andreas SchuhBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Antonios MakropoulosBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dafnis BatalleDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jana HutterCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Katy VecchiatoCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Johannes K SteinwegCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Sean FitzgibbonCentre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emer HughesCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Anthony N PriceCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Andre MarquandDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Daniel ReuckertBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mary RutherfordCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Joseph V HajnalCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Serena J CounsellCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
A David EdwardsCentre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120088465Medical Research Council MR/K006355/1Medical Research Council MR/L011530/1Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premature birth occurs during a period of rapid brain growth. In this context, interpreting clinical neuroimaging can be complicated by the typical changes in brain contrast, size and gyrification occurring in the background to any pathology. To model and describe this evolving background in brain shape and contrast, we used a Bayesian regression technique, Gaussian process regression, adapted to multiple correlated outputs. Using MRI, we simultaneously estimated brain tissue intensity on T1- and T2-weighted scans as well as local tissue shape in a large cohort of 408 neonates scanned cross-sectionally across the perinatal period. The resulting model provided a continuous estimate of brain shape and intensity, appropriate to age at scan, degree of prematurity and sex. Next, we investigated the clinical utility of this model to detect focal white matter injury. In individual neonates, we calculated deviations of a neonate's observed MRI from that predicted by the model to detect punctate white matter lesions with very good accuracy (area under the curve > 0.95). To investigate longitudinal consistency of the model, we calculated model deviations in 46 neonates who were scanned on a second occasion. These infants' voxelwise deviations from the model could be used to identify them from the other 408 images in 83% (T2-weighted) and 76% (T1-weighted) of cases, indicating an anatomical fingerprint. Our approach provides accurate estimates of non-linear changes in brain tissue intensity and shape with clear potential for radiological use.

Indexed as

BrainBrain InjuriesCohort StudiesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLongitudinal StudiesNeuroimagingPregnancyPremature BirthWhite Matterbrain developmentimaging methodologyneonatologyneuroanatomyneuropathology

Identifiers

PMID31942938
PMCPMC7009541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.