Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31942758›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2020

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerability of Perampanel in Pediatric Patients Aged 4 Years or Older with Epilepsy: A Korean National Multicenter Study.

Su Kyeong Hwang, Yun Jin Lee, Sang Ook Nam, Won Seop Kim, Jon Soo Kim, Sun Jun Kim, Yun Jeong Lee, Soonhak Kwon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Su Kyeong Hwang *Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-7094
Yun Jin Lee *Department of Pediatrics, Pusan National University Children's Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-7018
Sang Ook NamDepartment of Pediatrics, Pusan National University Children's Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1312-3483
Won Seop KimDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4541-7902
Jon Soo KimDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-1942
Sun Jun KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7673-8728
Yun Jeong LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3472-5336
Soonhak KwonDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. shkwon@knu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-2243
Kyungpook National University · KRChungbuk National University · KRJeonbuk National University · KRPusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe US Food and Drug Administration approval for perampanel has only recently been expanded to patients as young as 4 years, and so there have been few real-life studies of the effects of perampanel in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, factors affecting treatment response, and tolerability of perampanel as an add-on therapy in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective observational study collected data from pediatric epilepsy centers of four Korean national universities. Changes in the seizure frequency from baseline, adverse events, and retention rates were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months. Adverse events and discontinuation profiles were obtained to assess tolerability.

resultsThis study included 220 children and adolescents (117 males and 103 females) aged 4 to 20 years. The overall response rate was 43.6%, and the seizure-freedom rate was 17.7%. Factors affecting a good treatment response were the absence of intellectual disability, small number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs, and low baseline seizure frequency. Eighty-eight patients (40%) experienced adverse events, but they mostly were of mild severity and resolved after the dose reduction or discontinuation of perampanel. The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 85.0%, 71.8%, and 50.5%, respectively.

conclusionsAdjunctive treatment with perampanel was efficacious and tolerated in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy. Early perampanel treatment may help to reduce the burden of their seizures and improve their quality of life.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionschildrenperampaneltreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID31942758
PMCPMC6974830
OpenAlexW3000507271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.