ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
"Modern agriculture" transfers many pesticides to watercourses: a case study of a representative rural catchment of southern Brazil.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agricultural Fungicide Mancozeb in Leaf Litter Enhances Survival and Growth of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).Environmental toxicology · 2026Article
- Effects of the herbicide 2,4 D active ingredient and commercial formulations on the early life stages of the amphibian Physalaemus gracilis.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Pesticide Contamination in the Hair of Children From Colonia San Juan, a Rural Community in Paraguay.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Article
- Degradation of 2,4-D by plant growth-promotingMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Environmental Challenges in Southern Brazil: Impacts of Pollution and Extreme Weather Events on Biodiversity and Human Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Comparison of the drinking water standard for pesticides of the Brazil with other countries.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Identification of Heavy Metals and Organic Micropollutants in Drinking Water Sources in Typical Villages and Towns in Northeast China.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Impact of Pesticides on Human Health in the Last Six Years in Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Mobilization and transport of pesticides with runoff and suspended sediment during flooding events in an agricultural catchment of Southern Brazil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Organic composition of epilithic biofilms from agricultural and urban watershed in South Brazil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Strategies for identifying pollution sources in a headwater catchment based on multi-scale water quality monitoring.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- The use of epilithic biofilms as bioaccumulators of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in aquatic environments.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2020Review
- Pesticide bioaccumulation in epilithic biofilms as a biomarker of agricultural activities in a representative watershed.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The total cultivated area in Brazil reached to 62 million ha in 2018, with the predominance of genetically modified soybean and corn (36 and 17 million ha, respectively) in no-tillage systems. In 2018, 5.3 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.