Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31942681›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020

Evaluation of Probiotic Properties and Prebiotic Utilization Potential of Weissella paramesenteroides Isolated From Fruits.

Kinjal Pabari, Sheetal Pithva, Charmy Kothari, Ravi Kiran Purama, Kanthi Kiran Kondepudi, Bharatkumar Rajiv Manuel Vyas, Ramesh Kothari, Padma Ambalam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Biodiversity of the antimicrobial potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biocontrol Potential of a Mango-DerivedJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Evaluation of Safety and Probiotic Properties ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kinjal PabariDepartment of Biotechnology, Christ College, Vidya Niketan, Saurashtra University, PO, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360005, India.
Sheetal PithvaGovernment Science College, Sector 15, Gandhinagar, India.
Charmy KothariDepartment of Biotechnology, Christ College, Vidya Niketan, Saurashtra University, PO, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360005, India.
Ravi Kiran PuramaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Marg, Po Box No. 10531, New Delhi, India.
Kanthi Kiran KondepudiNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, S.A.S. Nagar, Punjab, 140306, India.
Bharatkumar Rajiv Manuel VyasUGC-CAS Department of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360005, India.
Ramesh KothariUGC-CAS Department of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360005, India. kothari1971@gmail.com.
Padma AmbalamDepartment of Biotechnology, Christ College, Vidya Niketan, Saurashtra University, PO, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360005, India. padma_ambalam@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-6312
Saurashtra University · INNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute · INNational Institute of Plant Genome Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weissella paramesenteroides has gained a considerable attention as bacteriocin and exopolysaccharide producers. However, potential of W. paramesenteroides to utilize different prebiotics is unexplored area of research. Fruits being vectors of various probiotics, five W. paramesenteroides strains, namely, FX1, FX2, FX5, FX9, and FX12, were isolated from different fruits. They were screened and selected based on their ability to survive at pH 2.5 and in 1.0% sodium taurocholate, high cell surface hydrophobicity, mucin adhesion, bile-induced biofilm formation, antimicrobial activity (AMA) against selected enteropathogens, and prebiotic utilization ability, implicating the functional properties of these strains. In vitro safety evaluation showed that strains were susceptible to antibiotics except vancomycin and did not harbor any virulent traits such as biogenic amine production, hemolysis, and DNase production. Based on their functionality, two strains FX5 and FX9 were selected for prebiotic utilization studies by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production by high performance liquid chromatography. TLC profile evinced the ability of these two strains to utilize low molecular weight galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and fructooligosaccharides (FOS), as only the upper low molecular weight fractions were disappeared from cell-free-supernatants (CFS). Enhanced β-galactosidase activity correlated with galactose accumulation in residual CFS of GOS displayed GOS utilization ability. Both the strains exhibited AMA against E. coli and Staph. aureus and high SCFAs production in the presence of prebiotic, suggesting their synbiotic potential. Thus, W. paramesenteroides strains FX5 and FX9 exhibit potential probiotic properties with prebiotic utilization and can be taken forward to evaluate synergistic synbiotic potential in detail.

Indexed as

PrebioticsProbioticsWeissellaBacterial AdhesionEscherichia coliFruitPrebioticsAntimicrobial activityPrebioticsProbioticsShort-chain fatty acidsWeissella paramesenteroides

Identifiers

PMID31942681
OpenAlexW3000278105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.