ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2019
Evaluation of Tissue-engineered Skin on Base of Human Amniotic Membrane for Wound Healing.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Amniotic Membrane in Skin Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human amniotic membranes (hAMs) have shown promising results in recent studies aimed at improving wound healing through several mechanisms. We wanted to investigate its properties as a scaffold by adding autologous cells to treat full-thickness skin defects and hypothesized that recultivated hAM would show an even improved wound healing by accelerating the epidermal closure of the wound.
methodsIn an air-liquid cell culture, we cultivated autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts on the hAM until a mostly keratinized surface was achieved. These hAM, de-epithelialized hAM, native hAM with remaining allogenous cells, and negative controls were compared in the treatment of circular 30 × 30 mm
resultsRats treated with de-epithelialized hAM showed more extent wound contraction (
conclusionThe rats treated with hAM showed no improved wound healing but a tendency toward a more prominent basement membrane in the resulting scar.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.