ArticleJournal of cytology
Evaluation of Accuracy of Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology: Review of Morphology and Diagnostic Challenges in Each Category.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer cytopathology · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative identification of mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a cross-sectional diagnostic analytical study.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Low-grade oncocytoid neoplasm in the Milan system: Tips for the diagnosis of Warthin tumor and other differential diagnostic considerations.Cancer cytopathology · 2025Review
- Article
- Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology: A Prospective Study.Iranian journal of pathology · 2023Article
- A rare case report of acanthomatous ameloblastoma based on aspiration cytology with histopathological confirmation.CytoJournal · 2023Article
- Recurrent Cylindroma of the Scalp: A Cytomorphological Evaluation at Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology.Cureus · 2022Article
- The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: The clinical impact so far. Considerations from theory to practice.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2020Article
- Reclassification of Salivary Gland Aspirates Based on "The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology": A Five-Year Retrospective Study.Journal of cytologyArticle
- Exploring salivary gland lesions: Unveiling malignancy risks using the Milan classification.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in salivary gland lesions is challenging for the cytopathologists due to diverse morphological pattern and overlapping morphologic features which are responsible for the pitfalls. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Milan system in the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions and to discuss and review the morphology and diagnostic challenges in individual Milan categories. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was a retrospective diagnostic analytical study in the department of pathology at a tertiary care hospital attached to medical college over a duration of 2 years. All the salivary gland FNAC cases were reviewed and divided into six categories as per the proposed Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology. Histopathology correlation was performed wherever possible.
resultsA total of 131 cases formed the study group. The number of cases in each category were: nondiagnostic 4.5%, nonneoplastic 51.9%, atypical lesions 0.76%, neoplastic category benign neoplasm 21.37%, salivary lesion of uncertain malignant potential 1.52%, suspicious category 2.29%, and malignant category 17.5%. The risk of malignancy for each categories were 6.25% (nonneoplastic), 100% (atypical), 3.3% (neoplastic), 0% (benign), 25% (salivary neoplasm of uncertain neoplastic potential), 100% (suspicious for malignancy), and 100% (malignant) categories. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNAC with application of Milan system was 89.4%, 100%, 100%, and 95.74%, respectively.
conclusionThe high efficacy of FNAC obtained in the present study, when Milan system was applied, confirms the usefulness of this scheme in reporting salivary gland lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.