Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31942084›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2019

Robust Bayesian inference via coarsening.

Jeffrey W Miller, David B Dunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The evolution of genetic drift over 50,000 generations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Product Centred Dirichlet Processes for Bayesian Multiview Clustering.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025
    Article
  7. Robustifying Likelihoods by Optimistically Re-weighting Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Bayesian Clustering via Fusing of Localized Densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Gibbs Posterior Framework for Fair Clustering.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Spectral Clustering, Bayesian Spanning Forest, and Forest Process.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Reproducible parameter inference using bagged posteriors.Electronic journal of statistics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Bayesian feature allocation model for identifying cell subpopulations using CyTOF data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2023
    Article
  19. Bayesian cluster analysis.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Escaping The Curse of Dimensionality in Bayesian Model-Based Clustering.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey W MillerDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University.
David B DunsonDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University.

Funding

Reproducibility and Robustness of Dimensionality ReductionR01ES027498 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Bayesian Methods for High-Dimensional Epidemiologic DataR01ES020619 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Bayesian Methods for Assessing Gene by Environment InteractionsR01ES017436 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DUNSON, DAVID BRIAN · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017436NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020619NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard approach to Bayesian inference is based on the assumption that the distribution of the data belongs to the chosen model class. However, even a small violation of this assumption can have a large impact on the outcome of a Bayesian procedure. We introduce a novel approach to Bayesian inference that improves robustness to small departures from the model: rather than conditioning on the event that the observed data are generated by the model, one conditions on the event that the model generates data close to the observed data, in a distributional sense. When closeness is defined in terms of relative entropy, the resulting "coarsened" posterior can be approximated by simply tempering the likelihood-that is, by raising the likelihood to a fractional power-thus, inference can usually be implemented via standard algorithms, and one can even obtain analytical solutions when using conjugate priors. Some theoretical properties are derived, and we illustrate the approach with real and simulated data using mixture models and autoregressive models of unknown order.

Indexed as

clusteringModel errormodel misspecificationpower likelihoodrelative entropytempering

Identifiers

PMID31942084
PMCPMC6961963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.