Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31942072›Full record

ArticleNature2020

Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning.

Andrew W Senior, Richard Evans, John Jumper, James Kirkpatrick, Laurent Sifre, Tim Green, Chongli Qin, Augustin Žídek, Alexander W R Nelson, Alex Bridgland and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,230 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,230citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,230 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence catalyzes antimicrobial peptide design.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Review
  3. Distinct Molten-Globule Conformations in an Interacting Protein Domain Resolved byAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  4. Scientific culture in the age of AI.Nature cell biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Autophagy modulation in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

1,170 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Andrew W Senior *DeepMind, London, UK. andrewsenior@google.com.
Richard Evans *DeepMind, London, UK.
John Jumper *DeepMind, London, UK.
James Kirkpatrick *DeepMind, London, UK.
Laurent Sifre *DeepMind, London, UK.
Tim GreenDeepMind, London, UK.
Chongli QinDeepMind, London, UK.
Augustin ŽídekDeepMind, London, UK.
Alexander W R NelsonDeepMind, London, UK.
Alex BridglandDeepMind, London, UK.
Hugo PenedonesDeepMind, London, UK.
Stig PetersenDeepMind, London, UK.
Karen SimonyanDeepMind, London, UK.
Steve CrossanDeepMind, London, UK.
Pushmeet KohliDeepMind, London, UK.
David T JonesThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
David SilverDeepMind, London, UK.
Koray KavukcuogluDeepMind, London, UK.
Demis HassabisDeepMind, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure prediction can be used to determine the three-dimensional shape of a protein from its amino acid sequence

Indexed as

Deep LearningModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceCaspasesDatasets as TopicProtein FoldingProteinscaspase 13CaspasesProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.