Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941889›Full record

ArticleScientific data2020

Reference tool kinematics-kinetics and tissue surface strain data during fundamental surgical acts.

Tyler Schimmoeller, Erica E Neumann, Tara F Nagle, Ahmet Erdemir

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tyler SchimmoellerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Erica E NeumannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-5107
Tara F NagleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ahmet ErdemirDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. erdemira@ccf.org.

Funding

United States Department of Defense | United States Army | Army Medical Command | Medical Research and Materiel Command (U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command) W81XWH-15-1-0232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haptic based surgical simulations are popular training aids in medicine. Previously, surgical tool loads and motion were measured during cutting and needle insertion on non-human tissue and several haptic based simulations were developed to enhance surgical training. However, there was a lack of realistic foundational data regarding the mechanical responses of human tissue and tools during fundamental acts of surgery, i.e., cutting, suturing, retracting, pinching and indenting. This study used four recently developed surgical tools in a variety of procedures on a diverse set of cadaver leg specimens from human donors. The kinematics and kinetics of surgical tools were recorded along with topical three-dimensional strain during commonly performed surgical procedures. Full motion and load signatures of foundational surgical acts can also be used beyond the development of authentic visual and haptic simulations of surgery, i.e., they provide mechanical specifications for the development of autonomous surgical systems.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingSurgical InstrumentsSurgical Procedures, OperativeBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverHumansKineticsLeg

Identifiers

PMID31941889
PMCPMC6962378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.