Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941799›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2020

What do emergency department physicians and nurses feel? A qualitative study of emotions, triggers, regulation strategies, and effects on patient care.

Linda M Isbell, Edwin D Boudreaux, Hannah Chimowitz, Guanyu Liu, Emma Cyr, Ezekiel Kimball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perceived support needs of novice nurses working in emergency departments of selected public hospitals in Tshwane, South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Agreement between the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory among emergency physicians and trainees.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linda M IsbellPsychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA lisbell@psych.umass.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3467-3548
Edwin D BoudreauxEmergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Hannah ChimowitzPsychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Guanyu LiuPsychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Emma CyrPsychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Ezekiel KimballCollege of Education, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USAmherst College · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Emotional Influences on Diagnostic Error in Emergency Medicine: An Experimental Approach to Understand Diagnostic Failure and Facilitate Improvement for Patients with and without Mental IllnessR01HS025752 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI ISBELL, LINDA M · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite calls to study how healthcare providers' emotions may impact patient safety, little research has addressed this topic. The current study aimed to develop a comprehensive understanding of emergency department (ED) providers' emotional experiences, including what triggers their emotions, the perceived effects of emotions on clinical decision making and patient care, and strategies providers use to manage their emotions to reduce patient safety risks.

methodsEmploying grounded theory, we conducted 86 semi-structured qualitative interviews with experienced ED providers (45 physicians and 41 nurses) from four academic medical centres and four community hospitals in the Northeastern USA. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop a grounded model of provider emotions and patient safety in the ED.

resultsED providers reported experiencing a wide range of emotions in response to patient, hospital, and system-level factors. Patients triggered both positive and negative emotions; hospital and system-level factors largely triggered negative emotions. Providers expressed awareness of possible adverse effects of negative emotions on clinical decision making, highlighting concerns about patient safety. Providers described strategies they employ to regulate their emotions, including emotional suppression, distraction, and cognitive reappraisal. Many providers believed that these strategies effectively guarded against the risk of emotions negatively influencing their clinical decision making.

conclusionThe role of emotions in patient safety is in its early stages and many opportunities exist for researchers, educators, and clinicians to further address this important issue. Our findings highlight the need for future work to (1) determine whether providers' emotion regulation strategies are effective at mitigating patient safety risk, (2) incorporate emotional intelligence training into healthcare education, and (3) shift the cultural norms in medicine to support meaningful discourse around emotions.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalNursesPhysiciansEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePatient CareQualitative Researchdiagnostic errorsemergency departmentpatient safetyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31941799
PMCPMC7363518
OpenAlexW3000279521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.