Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941689›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

Comparison of the ID Now Influenza A & B 2, Cobas Influenza A/B, and Xpert Xpress Flu Point-of-Care Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Influenza A/B Virus Detection in Children.

Neena Kanwar, Jeffrey Michael, Kathryn Doran, Emily Montgomery, Rangaraj Selvarangan

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Types and Applications of Nicking Enzyme-Combined Isothermal Amplification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Prospective evaluation of ID NOW COVID-19 assay used as point-of-care test in an emergency department.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Respiratory pathogen diversity and co-infections in rural Zambia.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. PCR past, present and future.BioTechniques · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neena KanwarChildren's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Jeffrey MichaelChildren's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Kathryn DoranChildren's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Emily MontgomeryChildren's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Rangaraj SelvaranganChildren's Mercy Hospital and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA rselvarangan@cmh.edu.
Children's Mercy Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of influenza (Flu) is critical for patient management and infection control. The ID Now influenza A & B 2 (ID Now) assay (Abbott Laboratories), Cobas influenza A/B nucleic acid test (LIAT; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.), and Xpert Xpress Flu (Xpert; Cepheid) are rapid, point-of-care molecular assays for Flu virus detection. The study aim was to compare the performances of these three commercially available Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-waived Flu virus assays. We prospectively enrolled 201 children <18 years old from January to April 2018 and collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens in viral medium. Aliquots were frozen for testing on different diagnostic platforms, as per the manufacturers' instructions. CDC Flu A/B PCR was used as a reference method to evaluate the performances of these three platforms. Among the 201 specimens tested, the CDC Flu A/B PCR assay detected Flu A/B virus in 107 samples (Flu A virus, 73 samples; Flu B virus, 36 samples; dual Flu A/B virus positive, 2 samples), while the ID Now virus detected 102 samples (Flu A virus, 69 samples; Flu B virus, 37 samples; dual Flu A/B virus positive, 4 samples; invalid rate, 1/201 [0.5%]), the LIAT detected 112 samples (Flu A virus, 74 samples; Flu B virus, 38 samples; invalid rate, 11/201 [5.5%]), and the Xpert assay detected 112 samples (Flu A virus, 76 samples; Flu B virus, 36 samples; invalid rate, 6/201 [3.0%]). The overall sensitivities for the ID Now assay, LIAT, and Xpert assay for Flu A virus detection (93.2%, 100%, and 100%, respectively) and Flu B virus detection (97.2%, 94.4%, and 91.7%, respectively) were comparable. The specificity for Flu A and B virus detection by all methods was >97%. These molecular assays had higher sensitivity than did a historical standard-of-care test from the BD Veritor antigen test (Flu A virus, 79.5%; Flu B virus, 66.7%).

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanMaleNasopharynxNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reactionchildreninfluenza detectionmolecular diagnostic assays performance

Identifiers

PMID31941689
PMCPMC7041562
OpenAlexW3000509606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.