Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941575›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2019

The Use of Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Predicting Appearance and Biogeographic Ancestry.

Peter M Schneider, Barbara Prainsack, Manfred Kayser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Application of HIrisPlex-S System in Forensic DNA Phenotyping].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. RNA Analysis in Forensic Molecular Biology.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The Revolution of Animal Genomics in Forensic Sciences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter M SchneiderInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany; Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Austria; Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Barbara Prainsack
Manfred Kayser
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons whose identifying DNA profile (STR profile) is not yet known to the ingvestigating authorities cannot be identified by standard forensic DNA analysis (STR profiling) as it is now practiced. In view of the current public debate, particularly in Germany, on the legalization of so-called forensic DNA phenotyping, we present its scientific basis, societal aspects, and forensic applications and describe the analytic techniques that are now available.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and in public media, and on the authors' own research.

resultsForensically validated DNA test systems are available for the categorization of eye, hair, and skin color and the inference of continental biogeographic ancestry. As for statistical measures of test accuracy, the AUC (area under the curve) values lie in the range 0.74-0.99 for eye color, 0.64-0.94 for hair color, and 0.72-0.99 for skin color, depending on the predictive model and color category used.The corre- sponding positive predictive values (PPV) are lower. Empirical social-scientific research on forensic DNA phenotyping has shown that preserving privacy and protecting against discrimination are major ethical and regulatory considerations.

conclusionAll three methods of forensic DNA phenotyping-the predition of exter- nally visible characteristics, biogeographic ancestry, and the estimation of age from crime scene DNA-require a proper regulatory framework and should be used in conjunction with each other. Before forensic DNA phenotyping can be implemented in forensic practice, steps must be taken to minimize the risks of violation of privacy scrimination and to ensure that these methods are used transpar- ently and proportionately.

Indexed as

DNAForensic GeneticsPhenotypeBayes TheoremGermanyHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA

Identifiers

PMID31941575
PMCPMC6976916
OpenAlexW3005322526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.