Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941544›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Dose reduction and withdrawal strategy for TNF-inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: design of a pragmatic open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Celia A J Michielsens, Nadine Boers, Nathan den Broeder, Mark H Wenink, Aatke van der Maas, Elien A M Mahler, Michelle L M Mulder, Désirée van der Heijde, Frank H J van den Hoogen, Lise M Verhoef and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Celia A J MichielsensDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. c.michielsens@maartenskliniek.nl.
Nadine BoersDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nathan den BroederDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mark H WeninkDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aatke van der MaasDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Elien A M MahlerDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michelle L M MulderDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Désirée van der HeijdeDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frank H J van den HoogenDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lise M VerhoefDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alfons A den BroederDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sint Maartenskliniek · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

ReumaNederland 17-3-303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are effective in the treatment of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), including psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, these drugs come with some disadvantages such as adverse events, practical burden for patients and high costs. Dose optimisation of TNFi after patients have reached low disease activity (LDA) has been shown feasible and safe in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data on TNFi dose optimisation in PsA and axSpA are scarce, especially pragmatic, randomised strategy studies.

methodsWe developed an investigator-driven, pragmatic, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial (DRESS-PS) to compare the effects of a disease activity-guided treat-to-target strategy with or without a tapering attempt in patients with SpA (PsA and axSpA combined), ≥ 16 years of age, who are being treated with TNFi, and have had at least 6 months of low disease activity. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients in LDA after 12 months of follow up. Patients are assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow up. Bayesian power analyses with a weakened prior based on a similar study performed in RA resulted in a sample size of 95 patients in total. DISCUSSION: More knowledge on disease activity-guided treatment algorithms would contribute to better treatment choices and cost savings and potentially decrease the risk of side effects. In this article we elucidate some of our design choices on TNFi dose optimisation and its clinical and methodological consequences.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register, NL6771. Registered on 27 November 2018 (CMO NL66181.091.18, 23 October 2018).

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdolescentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalArthritis, PsoriaticBayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDose-Response Relationship, DrugEquivalence Trials as TopicEtanerceptFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfliximabNetherlandsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalEtanerceptgolimumabInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsDose reductionPsoriatic arthritisRandomised controlled trialSpondyloarthritisTaperingTNF inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31941544
PMCPMC6964104
OpenAlexW3000405276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.