ArticleTrials2020
The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson's disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03830190 (Cost-Effectiveness of Specialized Nursing Interventions for Patients With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cost-Effectiveness of Specialized Nursing Interventions for Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Protocol of the interdisciplinary and intersectoral randomized controlled trial in Parkinson patients in a specialized network in Germany: the INSPIRE Trial.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Review
- Nursing consultation protocol for supported self-care for people with Parkinson's disease.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Old problems, new solutions: harnessing technology and innovation in Parkinson's disease-evidence and experiences from Thailand.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024Review
- Detecting Parkinson's disease from shoe-mounted accelerometer sensors using convolutional neural networks optimized with modified metaheuristics.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Age and gender differences in non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Parkinson's Nurses Are Crucial for the Management of Parkinson's Disease: 2007-2024.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Review
- A Narrative Review of Specialist Parkinson's Nurses: Evolution, Evidence and Expectation.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Effects of physician visit frequency for Parkinson's disease treatment on mortality, hospitalization, and costs: a retrospective cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Using an economic evaluation approach to support specialist nursing services for people with Parkinson's in a regional community.Journal of advanced nursing · 2021Article
- Imaging the Functional Neuroanatomy of Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Applications and Future Directions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Recommendations for Standards of Network Care for Patients with Parkinson's Disease in Germany.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend that every person with Parkinson's disease (PD) should have access to Parkinson's disease nurse specialist (PDNS) care. However, there is little scientific evidence of the cost-effectiveness of PDNS care. This hampers wider implementation, creates unequal access to care, and possibly leads to avoidable disability and costs. Therefore, we aim to study the (cost-)effectiveness of specialized nursing care provided by a PDNS compared with usual care (without PDNS) for people with PD in all disease stages. To gain more insight into the deployed interventions and their effects, a preplanned subgroup analysis will be performed on the basis of disease duration (diagnosis < 5, 5-10, or > 10 years ago).
methodsWe will perform an 18-month, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial in eight community hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 240 people with PD who have not been treated by a PDNS over the past 2 years will be included, independent of disease severity or duration. In each hospital, 30 patients will randomly be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either care by a PDNS (who works according to a recent guideline on PDNS care) or usual care. We will use two co-primary outcomes: quality of life (measured with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39) and motor symptoms (measured with the Movement Disorders Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III). Secondary outcomes include nonmotor symptoms, health-related quality of life, experienced quality of care, self-management, medication adherence, caregiver burden, and coping skills. Data will be collected after 12 months and 18 months by a blinded researcher. A healthcare utilization and productivity loss questionnaire will be completed every 3 months. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have an immediate impact on the current care of people with PD. We hypothesize that by offering more patients access to PDNS care, quality of life will increase. We also expect healthcare costs to remain equal because increases in direct medical costs (funding additional nurses) will be offset by a reduced number of consultations with the general practitioner and neurologist. If these outcomes are reached, wide implementation of PDNS care will be warranted.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03830190. Registered February 5, 2019 (retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.