Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941526›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2020

p66ShcA functions as a contextual promoter of breast cancer metastasis.

Kyle Lewis, Alex Kiepas, Jesse Hudson, Julien Senecal, Jacqueline R Ha, Elena Voorand, Matthew G Annis, Valerie Sabourin, Ryuhjin Ahn, Rachel La Selva and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The p66International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. NADOncogene · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyle LewisLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Alex KiepasDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Jesse HudsonLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Julien SenecalGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, 1160 Pine Avenue, West, Room 513, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada.
Jacqueline R HaLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Elena VoorandDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Matthew G AnnisGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, 1160 Pine Avenue, West, Room 513, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada.
Valerie SabourinLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Ryuhjin AhnLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Rachel La SelvaLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Sébastien TabarièsGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, 1160 Pine Avenue, West, Room 513, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada.
Brian E HsuGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, 1160 Pine Avenue, West, Room 513, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada.
Matthew J SiegelLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Matthew DanknerGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, 1160 Pine Avenue, West, Room 513, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada.
Eduardo Cepeda CanedoLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Mathieu LajoieGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, 1160 Pine Avenue, West, Room 513, Montreal, QC, H3A 1A3, Canada.
Ian R WatsonDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Claire M BrownDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Peter M SiegelDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada. peter.siegel@mcgill.ca.
Josie Ursini-SiegelLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada. giuseppina.ursini-siegel@mcgill.ca.
McGill University · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-133670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe p66ShcA redox protein is the longest isoform of the Shc1 gene and is variably expressed in breast cancers. In response to a variety of stress stimuli, p66ShcA becomes phosphorylated on serine 36, which allows it to translocate from the cytoplasm to the mitochondria where it stimulates the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Conflicting studies suggest both pro- and anti-tumorigenic functions for p66ShcA, which prompted us to examine the contribution of tumor cell-intrinsic functions of p66ShcA during breast cancer metastasis.

methodsWe tested whether p66ShcA impacts the lung-metastatic ability of breast cancer cells. Breast cancer cells characteristic of the ErbB2+/luminal (NIC) or basal (4T1) subtypes were engineered to overexpress p66ShcA. In addition, lung-metastatic 4T1 variants (4T1-537) were engineered to lack endogenous p66ShcA via Crispr/Cas9 genomic editing. p66ShcA null cells were then reconstituted with wild-type p66ShcA or a mutant (S36A) that cannot translocate to the mitochondria, thereby lacking the ability to stimulate mitochondrial-dependent ROS production. These cells were tested for their ability to form spontaneous metastases from the primary site or seed and colonize the lung in experimental (tail vein) metastasis assays. These cells were further characterized with respect to their migration rates, focal adhesion dynamics, and resistance to anoikis in vitro. Finally, their ability to survive in circulation and seed the lungs of mice was assessed in vivo.

resultsWe show that p66ShcA increases the lung-metastatic potential of breast cancer cells by augmenting their ability to navigate each stage of the metastatic cascade. A non-phosphorylatable p66ShcA-S36A mutant, which cannot translocate to the mitochondria, still potentiated breast cancer cell migration, lung colonization, and growth of secondary lung metastases. However, breast cancer cell survival in the circulation uniquely required an intact p66ShcA S36 phosphorylation site.

conclusionThis study provides the first evidence that both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial p66ShcA pools collaborate in breast cancer cells to promote their maximal metastatic fitness.

Indexed as

Oxidative StressAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMitochondriaPhosphorylationReactive Oxygen SpeciesSrc Homology 2 Domain-Containing, Transforming Protein 1Reactive Oxygen SpeciesSHC1 protein, humanSrc Homology 2 Domain-Containing, Transforming Protein 1Breast cancerLung metastasisp66ShcAReactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID31941526
PMCPMC6964019
OpenAlexW3005904785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.