Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941397›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2020

Beneficial bacteria activate type-I interferon production via the intracellular cytosolic sensors STING and MAVS.

Jorge Gutierrez-Merino, Beatriz Isla, Theo Combes, Fernando Martinez-Estrada, Carlos Maluquer De Motes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endogenous retroelements promote tolerance to dietary antigens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge Gutierrez-MerinoSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey , GU2 7XH Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0088-0397
Beatriz IslaSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey , GU2 7XH Guildford, UK.
Theo CombesSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey , GU2 7XH Guildford, UK.
Fernando Martinez-EstradaSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey , GU2 7XH Guildford, UK.
Carlos Maluquer De MotesSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey , GU2 7XH Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4712-4601
University of Surrey · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M003647/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type-I interferon (IFN-I) cytokines are produced by immune cells in response to microbial infections, cancer and autoimmune diseases, and subsequently, trigger cytoprotective and antiviral responses through the activation of IFN-I stimulated genes (ISGs). The ability of intestinal microbiota to modulate innate immune responses is well known, but the mechanisms underlying such responses remain elusive. Here we report that the intracellular sensors stimulator of IFN genes (STING) and mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) are essential for the production of IFN-I in response to lactic acid bacteria (LAB), common gut commensal bacteria with beneficial properties. Using human macrophage cells we show that LAB strains that potently activate the inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB are poor inducers of IFN-I and conversely, those triggering significant amounts of IFN-I fail to activate NF-κB. This IFN-I response is also observed in human primary macrophages, which modulate CD64 and CD40 upon challenge with IFN-I-inducing LAB. Mechanistically, IFN-I inducers interact more intimately with phagocytes as compared to NF-κB-inducers, and fail to activate IFN-I in the presence of phagocytosis inhibitors. These bacteria are then sensed intracellularly by the cytoplasmic sensors STING and, to a lesser extent, MAVS. Accordingly, macrophages deficient for STING showed dramatically reduced phosphorylation of TANK-binding kinase (TBK)-1 and IFN-I activation, which resulted in lower expression of ISGs. Our findings demonstrate a major role for intracellular sensing and STING in the production of IFN-I by beneficial bacteria and the existence of bacteria-specific immune signatures, which can be exploited to promote cytoprotective responses and prevent overreactive NF-κB-dependent inflammation in the gut.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingHumansImmunity, InnateInterferon Type ILactiplantibacillus plantarumLactobacillalesLeukocytes, MononuclearMacrophagesMembrane ProteinsMonocytesNF-kappa BPediococcus pentosaceusPhagocytosisPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSTING ProteinAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingInterferon Type IMAVS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNF-kappa BProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSTING1 protein, humanSTING ProteinTBK1 protein, humanbeneficial microbesinterferonLactic acid bacteriaMAVSSTING

Identifiers

PMID31941397
PMCPMC7524384
OpenAlexW2995998815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.