ReviewGenes2020
Mapping DNA Topoisomerase Binding and Cleavage Genome Wide Using Next-Generation Sequencing Techniques.
Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulation of DNA Topology in Archaea: State of the Art and Perspectives.Molecular microbiology · 2025Review
- Osmotic disruption of chromatin induces Topoisomerase 2 activity at sites of transcriptional stress.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Highly sensitive mapping of in vitro type II topoisomerase DNA cleavage sites with SHAN-seq.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Genome-wide Mapping of Topoisomerase Binding Sites Suggests Topoisomerase 3α (TOP3A) as a Reader of Transcription-Replication Conflicts (TRC).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Highly sensitive mapping ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- No Time to Relax and Unwind: Exploration of Topoisomerases and a Growing Field of Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Single-nucleotide resolution detection of Topo IV cleavage activity in theFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Structural and biochemical basis for DNA and RNA catalysis by human Topoisomerase 3β.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Extended sister-chromosome catenation leads to massive reorganization of the E. coli genome.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms have been adapted to generate genome-wide maps and sequence context of binding and cleavage of DNA topoisomerases (topos). Continuous refinements of these techniques have resulted in the acquisition of data with unprecedented depth and resolution, which has shed new light on in vivo topo behavior. Topos regulate DNA topology through the formation of reversible single- or double-stranded DNA breaks. Topo activity is critical for DNA metabolism in general, and in particular to support transcription and replication. However, the binding and activity of topos over the genome in vivo was difficult to study until the advent of NGS. Over and above traditional chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq approaches that probe protein binding, the unique formation of covalent protein-DNA linkages associated with DNA cleavage by topos affords the ability to probe cleavage and, by extension, activity over the genome. NGS platforms have facilitated genome-wide studies mapping the behavior of topos in vivo, how the behavior varies among species and how inhibitors affect cleavage. Many NGS approaches achieve nucleotide resolution of topo binding and cleavage sites, imparting an extent of information not previously attainable. We review the development of NGS approaches to probe topo interactions over the genome in vivo and highlight general conclusions and quandaries that have arisen from this rapidly advancing field of topoisomerase research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.