Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941101›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Engineering of Effector Domains for Targeted DNA Methylation with Reduced Off-Target Effects.

Daniel Hofacker, Julian Broche, Laura Laistner, Sabrina Adam, Pavel Bashtrykov, Albert Jeltsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. All-in-one vectors for epigenetic CRISPR inhibition ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR technologies for genome, epigenome and transcriptome editing.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel HofackerInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Julian BrocheInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Laura LaistnerInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Sabrina AdamInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Pavel BashtrykovInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Albert JeltschInstitute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-9290
University of Stuttgart · DE

Funding

Baden-Württemberg Stiftung ID09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenome editing is a promising technology, potentially allowing the stable reprogramming of gene expression profiles without alteration of the DNA sequence. Targeted DNA methylation has been successfully documented by many groups for silencing selected genes, but recent publications have raised concerns regarding its specificity. In the current work, we developed new EpiEditors for programmable DNA methylation in cells with a high efficiency and improved specificity. First, we demonstrated that the catalytically deactivated Cas9 protein (dCas9)-SunTag scaffold, which has been used earlier for signal amplification, can be combined with the DNMT3A-DNMT3L single-chain effector domain, allowing for a strong methylation at the target genomic locus. We demonstrated that off-target activity of this system is mainly due to untargeted freely diffusing DNMT3A-DNMT3L subunits. Therefore, we generated several DNMT3A-DNMT3L variants containing mutations in the DNMT3A part, which reduced their endogenous DNA binding. We analyzed the genome-wide DNA methylation of selected variants and confirmed a striking reduction of untargeted methylation, most pronounced for the R887E mutant. For all potential applications of targeted DNA methylation, the efficiency and specificity of the treatment are the key factors. By developing highly active targeted methylation systems with strongly improved specificity, our work contributes to future applications of this approach.

Indexed as

Cellular Reprogramming TechniquesDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationGene Expression RegulationProtein EngineeringDNA Methyltransferase 3AGenome-Wide Association StudyHEK293 CellsHumansProtein DomainsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Methyltransferase 3ADNMT3A protein, humanDNMT3L protein, humandCas9DNMT3A-DNMT3Lepigenome editingSunTagtargeted DNA methylation

Identifiers

PMID31941101
PMCPMC7013458
OpenAlexW2999647234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.