Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941094›Full record

ReviewGenes2020

Unwinding BRAHMA Functions in Plants.

Caroline Thouly, Marie Le Masson, Xuelei Lai, Cristel C Carles, Gilles Vachon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline ThoulyUniversité Grenoble Alpes, unité de formation et de recherche de Chimie et Biologie, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAe), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG), Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Marie Le MassonUniversité Grenoble Alpes, unité de formation et de recherche de Chimie et Biologie, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAe), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG), Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Xuelei LaiUniversité Grenoble Alpes, unité de formation et de recherche de Chimie et Biologie, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAe), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG), Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Cristel C CarlesUniversité Grenoble Alpes, unité de formation et de recherche de Chimie et Biologie, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAe), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG), Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9416-4860
Gilles VachonUniversité Grenoble Alpes, unité de formation et de recherche de Chimie et Biologie, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAe), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG), Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8401-9117
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ATP-dependent Switch/Sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex (CRC) regulates the transcription of many genes by destabilizing interactions between DNA and histones. In plants, BRAHMA (BRM), one of the two catalytic ATPase subunits of the complex, is the closest homolog of the yeast and animal SWI2/SNF2 ATPases. We summarize here the advances describing the roles of BRM in plant development as well as its recently reported chromatin-independent role in pri-miRNA processing in vitro and in vivo. We also enlighten the roles of plant-specific partners that physically interact with BRM. Three main types of partners can be distinguished: (i) DNA-binding proteins such as transcription factors which mostly cooperate with BRM in developmental processes, (ii) enzymes such as kinases or proteasome-related proteins that use BRM as substrate and are often involved in response to abiotic stress, and (iii) an RNA-binding protein which is involved with BRM in chromatin-independent pri-miRNA processing. This overview contributes to the understanding of the central position occupied by BRM within regulatory networks controlling fundamental biological processes in plants.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesPlant ProteinsPlantsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyMicroRNAsProteolysisRNA, PlantRNA PrecursorsTranscription FactorsAdenosine TriphosphatasesMicroRNAsPlant ProteinsRNA, PlantRNA PrecursorsTranscription FactorsBRAHMAchromatinmiRNAsremodelingSWI2/SNF2transcription factor

Identifiers

PMID31941094
PMCPMC7017052
OpenAlexW3000164594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.