Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31941047›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

3D Printing of Drug-Loaded Thermoplastic Polyurethane Meshes: A Potential Material for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Vaginal Surgery.

Juan Domínguez-Robles, Caterina Mancinelli, Elena Mancuso, Inmaculada García-Romero, Brendan F Gilmore, Luca Casettari, Eneko Larrañeta, Dimitrios A Lamprou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan Domínguez-RoblesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road 97, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.
Caterina MancinelliSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road 97, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.
Elena MancusoNanotechnology and Integrated Bio-Engineering Centre (NIBEC), Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-1656
Inmaculada García-RomeroWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.
Brendan F GilmoreSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road 97, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.
Luca CasettariDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Piazza del Rinascimento 6, 61029 Urbino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-8904
Eneko LarrañetaSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road 97, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3710-0438
Dimitrios A LamprouSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road 97, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8740-1661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current strategies to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI), include the surgical implantation of vaginal meshes. Recently, there have been multiple reports of issues generated by these meshes conventionally made of poly(propylene). This material is not the ideal candidate, due to its mechanical properties leading to complications such as chronic pain and infection. In the present manuscript, we propose the use of an alternative material, thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), loaded with an antibiotic in combination with fused deposition modelling (FDM) to prepare safer vaginal meshes. For this purpose, TPU filaments containing levofloxacin (LFX) in various concentrations (e.g., 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1%) were produced by extrusion. These filaments were used to 3D print vaginal meshes. The printed meshes were fully characterized through different tests/analyses such as fracture force studies, attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared, thermal analysis, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray microcomputed tomography (μCT), release studies and microbiology testing. The results showed that LFX was uniformly distributed within the TPU matrix, regardless the concentration loaded. The mechanical properties showed that poly(propylene) (PP) is a tougher material with a lower elasticity than TPU, which seemed to be a more suitable material due to its elasticity. In addition, the printed meshes showed a significant bacteriostatic activity on both

Indexed as

3D printinganti-infective devicesdrug releaseextrusionfused deposition modellingmechanical propertiespelvic organ prolapsestress urinary incontinencevaginal meshes

Identifiers

PMID31941047
PMCPMC7023419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.