Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940942›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

The Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Angela Guarino, Cristina Polini, Giuseppe Forte, Francesca Favieri, Ilaria Boncompagni, Maria Casagrande

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06090747 (Efecto de Una intervención Multidisciplinaria de Estilo de Vida Sobre el Exposoma de Pacientes premenopáusicas Con cáncer de Mama Estadios I-III.), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06090747 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efecto de Una intervención Multidisciplinaria de Estilo de Vida Sobre el Exposoma de Pacientes premenopáusicas Con cáncer de Mama Estadios I-III.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Cancerologia de MexicoRan2023 to 2028Enrolled146ConditionsBreast NeoplasmArmsHybrid lifestyle educational multidisciplinary intervention., Hybrid lifestyle personalized multidisciplinary intervention.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review on the effects of logotherapy and meaning-centered therapy on psychological and existential symptoms in women with breast and gynecological cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Psychological interventions for women with non-metastatic breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on the quality of life of breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mapping the literature on breast cancer and spirituality: emerging trends and thematic evolution in a 25-year bibliometric analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Cultural influence and narrative reconstruction: resilience- building among Chinese breast cancer survivors and implications for social work.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela GuarinoDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Cristina PoliniDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe ForteDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-041X
Francesca FavieriDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-5855
Ilaria BoncompagniDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Maria CasagrandeDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent oncological disease among women, and it represents the second oncological cause of death. Many studies have considered the quality of life in people with breast cancer because this condition has high comorbidity with mental distress, anxiety, affective disorders and depression. Psychological interventions can reduce the stressful consequences of both the diagnosis and the medical treatments of breast cancer. However, different methods (e.g., group or individual therapy) and focus (e.g., improving personal skills or increasing emotional well-being) do not help to identify which type of psychological therapy can be more effective in improving quality of life in patients with breast cancer. This study was aimed to systematically review and compare, by means of a meta-analysis, the efficacy of cognitive behavioural, supportive-expressive or psycho-educational treatments in women with breast cancer, focusing on anxiety, depression, mood and quality of life as outcomes. The PRISMA statement was adopted. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PUBMED and PsycArticles databases were used, and reference lists were examined for additional publications. In the selection of the articles were included studies considering women between 18 and 65 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer at any stage and under any treatment, and who underwent psychological group interventions. At the end of the systematic review, 45 studies met all inclusion criteria and were analysed in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size was medium, especially considering cognitive behavioural therapy and psycho-educational treatments. However, the studies are characterised by high methodological heterogeneity. Despite some limitations, this review and meta-analysis partially confirm the efficiency of cognitive-behavioural and psycho-educational therapies in the improvement of well-being in women with breast cancer.

Indexed as

anxietybreast cancercognitive behavioural therapydepressionmoodpsycho-educational therapypsychological treatmentquality of lifesupportive expressive therapy

Identifiers

PMID31940942
PMCPMC7019270
OpenAlexW3000033952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.