Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940863›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Continuous Ultrasonic Reactors: Design, Mechanism and Application.

Zhengya Dong, Claire Delacour, Keiran Mc Carogher, Aniket Pradip Udepurkar, Simon Kuhn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Three-dimensional array of microbubbles sonoporation of cells in microfluidics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Quid Pro Flow.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhengya DongDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3028-4131
Claire DelacourDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Keiran Mc CarogherDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Aniket Pradip UdepurkarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Simon KuhnDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2816-0060

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 677169-MicroParticleControl
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasonic small scale flow reactors have found increasing popularity among researchers as they serve as a very useful platform for studying and controlling ultrasound mechanisms and effects. This has led to the use of these reactors for not only research purposes, but also various applications in biological, pharmaceutical and chemical processes mostly on laboratory and, in some cases, pilot scale. This review summarizes the state of the art of ultrasonic flow reactors and provides a guideline towards their design, characterization and application. Particular examples for ultrasound enhanced multiphase processes, spanning from immiscible fluid-fluid to fluid-solid systems, are provided. To conclude, challenges such as reactor efficiency and scalability are addressed.

Indexed as

flow chemistrymicrofluidicsprocess intensificationsonochemistryultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31940863
PMCPMC7014228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.