ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Accuracy Enhancement of Anomaly Localization with Participatory Sensing Vehicles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Condition Monitoring of Rail Transport Systems: A Bibliometric Performance Analysis and Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- The Influence of Varying Atmospheric and Space Weather Conditions on the Accuracy of Position Determination.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- How to get best predictions for road monitoring using machine learning techniques.PeerJ. Computer science · 2022Article
- Analysis of Accuracy and Reliability of Different Types of GPS Receivers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Differentially Private Mobile Crowd Sensing Considering Sensing Errors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transportation agencies cannot afford to scale existing methods of roadway and railway condition monitoring to more frequently detect, localize, and fix anomalies throughout networks. Consequently, anomalies such as potholes and cracks develop between maintenance cycles and cause severe vehicle damage and safety issues. The need for a lower-cost and more-scalable solution spurred the idea of using sensors on board vehicles for a continuous and network-wide monitoring approach. However, the timing of the full adoption of connected vehicles is uncertain. Therefore, researchers used smartphones to evaluate a variety of methods to implement the application using regular vehicles. However, the poor accuracy of standard positioning services with low-cost geospatial positioning system (GPS) receivers presents a significant challenge. The experiments conducted in this research found that the error spread can exceed 32 m, and the mean localization error can exceed 27 m at highway speeds. Such large errors can make the application impractical for widespread use. This work used statistical techniques to inform a model that can provide more accurate localization. The proposed method can achieve sub-meter accuracy from participatory vehicle sensors by knowing only the mean GPS update rate, the mean traversal speed, and the mean latency of tagging accelerometer samples with GPS coordinates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.