Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940716›Full record

ReviewNeurointervention2020

Sclerotherapy for Venous Malformations of Head and Neck: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lucio De Maria, Paolo De Sanctis, Karthik Balakrishnan, Megha Tollefson, Waleed Brinjikji

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurointervention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring Bleomycin vs. Setrol Injections in Adults.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. New Insights into Cervicofacial Vascular Anomalies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Sclerotherapy with polidocanol microfoam in head and neck venous and lymphatic malformations.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucio De MariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Paolo De SanctisHumanitas University, Milano, IT, USA.
Karthik BalakrishnanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Megha TollefsonDepartment of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Radiology and Vascular Centers, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USHumanitas (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies performing sclerotherapy for treatment of venous malformations (VMs) of the face, head and neck. It is our hope that data from this study could be used to better inform providers and patients regarding the benefits and risks of percutaneous sclerotherapy for treatment of face, head and neck VMs. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from 2000-2018 for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of percutaneous sclerotherapy of neck, face and head VMs. Two independent reviewers selected studies and abstracted data. The primary outcomes were complete and partial resolution of the VM. Data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. Thirty-seven studies reporting on 2,067 patients were included. The overall rate of complete cure following percutaneous sclerotherapy with any agent was 64.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.4-72.0%). Sodium tetradecyl sulfate had the lowest complete cure rate at 55.5% (95% CI, 36.1-74.9%) while pingyangmycin had the highest cure rate at 82.9% (95% CI, 71.1-94.7%). Overall patient satisfaction rates were 91.0% (95% CI, 86.1-95.9%). Overall quality of life improvement was 78.9% (95% CI, 67.0-90.8%). Overall permanent morbidity/mortality was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3-1.3%) with no cases of mortality. Our systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 studies and over 2,000 patients found that percutaneous sclerotherapy is a very safe and effective treatment modality for treatment of VMs of the head, neck and face.

Indexed as

Head and neckSclerotherapyVenousVenous malformations

Identifiers

PMID31940716
PMCPMC7105094
OpenAlexW2999168590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.