Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940596›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

Image-guided focused ultrasound modulates electrically evoked motor neuronal activity in the mouse peripheral nervous system in vivo.

Min Gon Kim, Hermes A S Kamimura, Stephen A Lee, Christian Aurup, Nancy Kwon, Elisa E Konofagou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effective Ultrasonic Stimulation in Human Peripheral Nervous System.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min Gon KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3414-1595
Hermes A S KamimuraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-9870
Stephen A LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-4266
Christian AurupDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3916-0039
Nancy KwonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-4609
Elisa E KonofagouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-7936
Columbia University · US

Funding

An integrated theranostic system for breast cancerR01CA228275 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Mechanistic Monitoring of Ultrasound NeuromodulationR01EB027576 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228275NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFocused ultrasound (FUS) has recently been demonstrated capable of exciting motor neuronal activity. However, comprehensive understanding of elucidated excitatory and inhibitory effects is required to better assess FUS-mediated modulation. In this study, we demonstrate that image-guided FUS can selectively modulate motor neuron activity in the mouse sciatic nerve in vivo and attribute motor responses to thermal effects. APPROACH: FUS was applied on the sciatic nerve of anesthetized mice in vivo through the intact skin and muscle using ultrasound imaging for targeting. Both excitatory and inhibitory effects were recorded using electromyography (EMG) along with muscle response of the hind limb. The effects of FUS modulation versus heating by invasive alternative heating source (AHS) on electrically evoked EMG responses in the sciatic nerve in vivo were also investigated. The safety and reversibility of the technique were validated using histology and EMG recovery. MAIN

resultsThe FUS was capable of eliciting motor neuronal activity comparable to electrical stimulation ES, and facilitating motor neuronal response on electrically evoked potentials with temperature elevation up to 11.5 °C  ±  0.3 °C (PRF  ⩽  40 Hz). On the other hand, FUS-induced temperature elevations above 15.1 °C  ±  1.6 °C (PRF  ⩾  100 Hz) resulted in the suppression of electrically-evoked motor neuronal activity along with a decrease in EMG latency and area under the curve (AUC), which was validated against the invasive AHS with temperature elevation of 18.1 °C  ±  8.5 °C. Histological findings along with EMG responses after FUS modulation demonstrated a reversible or irreversible modulation. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings reported herein indicate that image-guided FUS (PRF  ⩽  100 Hz) induces safe and controllable modulation of involuntarily evoked motor neuron activity in vivo.

Indexed as

NeuronsSciatic NerveAnimalsElectric StimulationElectromyographyHindlimbMice

Identifiers

PMID31940596
PMCPMC7297566
OpenAlexW2999783238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.