ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020
CT Male Pelvic Organ Segmentation via Hybrid Loss Network With Incomplete Annotation.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automatic Segmentation of the Cisternal Segment of Trigeminal Nerve on MRI Using Deep Learning.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- Adaptive Region-Specific Loss for Improved Medical Image Segmentation.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2023Article
- Automatic segmentation of the female pelvic floor muscles on MRI for pelvic floor function assessment.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Radiotherapy planning parameters correlate with changes in the peripheral immune status of patients undergoing curative radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022Article
- Asymmetric multi-task attention network for prostate bed segmentation in computed tomography images.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
- 3D U-Net Improves Automatic Brain Extraction for Isotropic Rat Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Automatic Skull Stripping of Rat and Mouse Brain MRI Data Using U-Net.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Sufficient data with complete annotation is essential for training deep models to perform automatic and accurate segmentation of CT male pelvic organs, especially when such data is with great challenges such as low contrast and large shape variation. However, manual annotation is expensive in terms of both finance and human effort, which usually results in insufficient completely annotated data in real applications. To this end, we propose a novel deep framework to segment male pelvic organs in CT images with incomplete annotation delineated in a very user-friendly manner. Specifically, we design a hybrid loss network derived from both voxel classification and boundary regression, to jointly improve the organ segmentation performance in an iterative way. Moreover, we introduce a label completion strategy to complete the labels of the rich unannotated voxels and then embed them into the training data to enhance the model capability. To reduce the computation complexity and improve segmentation performance, we locate the pelvic region based on salient bone structures to focus on the candidate segmentation organs. Experimental results on a large planning CT pelvic organ dataset show that our proposed method with incomplete annotation achieves comparable segmentation performance to the state-of-the-art methods with complete annotation. Moreover, our proposed method requires much less effort of manual contouring from medical professionals such that an institutional specific model can be more easily established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.