Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940402›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of questionnaire as an instrument to measure the level of nutritional and weight gain knowledge in pregnant women in Poland. A pilot study.

Ewa Mierzejewska, Talita Honorato-Rzeszewicz, Dorota Świątkowska, Marzena Jurczak-Czaplicka, Tomasz Maciejewski, Anna Fijałkowska, Jagna Szulc-Kamińska, Anna Czach, Hanna Nałecz, Dorota Szostak-Węgierek and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ewa MierzejewskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Talita Honorato-RzeszewiczDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-7516
Dorota ŚwiątkowskaObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Marzena Jurczak-CzaplickaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz MaciejewskiObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna FijałkowskaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Jagna Szulc-KamińskaObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna CzachObstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Hanna NałeczDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0384-6469
Dorota Szostak-WęgierekDepartment of Clinical Dietetics, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-8176
Katarzyna SzamotulskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy is a period in life in which women are willing to improve their lifestyle. Providing proper information for these women is crucial for their health and the health of their offspring. Clear information about weak points in their nutritional and weight gain knowledge is the first step for proper health care assistance. There are a few previous studies evaluating the nutritional and weight gain knowledge of pregnant women. In the few studies available, different approaches were taken and there was no wider discussion on the content of the questionnaires attempting to measure level of knowledge. The aim of this study, designed in a pilot fashion, was to test the adequacy of the questionnaire as a research instrument in a group of 139 pregnant Polish women. The developed instrument is a 33-item questionnaire comprising four domains: weight gain, importance of nutrients, quality and quantity of food intake. The results of this study indicate that the questionnaire is stable and internal consistency is acceptable (Cronbach's alpha > 0.7) for dimensions with more than four items. For dimensions with less than four items, internal consistency was poor (Cronbach's alpha < 0.7). The cumulative explained variance for domains weight gain, importance of nutrients, quantity and quality of food intake was 54.74%, 42.74%, 54.42% and 48.99% respectively. Results from validity, reliability and factor analysis indicate that the questionnaire is adequate for its purpose.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKnowledgePilot ProjectsPolandPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPsychometricsRecordsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID31940402
PMCPMC6961901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.