Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940347›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Clinical state tracking in serious mental illness through computational analysis of speech.

Armen C Arevian, Daniel Bone, Nikolaos Malandrakis, Victor R Martinez, Kenneth B Wells, David J Miklowitz, Shrikanth Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Armen C ArevianJane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5508-4131
Daniel BoneSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Nikolaos MalandrakisSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Victor R MartinezSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Kenneth B WellsJane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
David J MiklowitzJane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Shrikanth NarayananSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Funding

The Role of Social Networks in Treatment Engagement for MinoritiesP30MH082760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MIRANDA, JEANNE · 2008 to 2012
$8.6M
Implementation of Technology-Based Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingR01AA018673 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES, NARAYANAN, SHRIKANTH · 2010 to 2020
$5.9M
Family-Focused Therapy for Individuals at High Clinical Risk for Psychosis: A Confirmatory Efficacy TrialR01MH123575 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BEARDEN, CARRIE E, MIKLOWITZ, DAVID JAY · 2020 to 2023
$5.4M
1/2-Early Intervention for Youth at Risk for Bipolar DisorderR01MH093676 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MIKLOWITZ, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Technology-Enhanced Family-Focused Treatment for Adolescents at High Risk for Mood DisordersR34MH117200 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AREVIAN, ARMEN C, MIKLOWITZ, DAVID JAY · 2018 to 2020
$933k
Family-Focused Therapy for Youth with Early-Onset Bipolar or Psychotic Disorders R33MH097007 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MIKLOWITZ, DAVID JAY · 2014 to 2016
$853k
Family-Focused Treatment for Youth with Early-Onset Bipolar or Psychotic DisorderR21MH097007 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MIKLOWITZ, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2013
$439k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018673NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH082760NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093676NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123575NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH097007NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH097007NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH117200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with serious mental illness experience changes in their clinical states over time that are difficult to assess and that result in increased disease burden and care utilization. It is not known if features derived from speech can serve as a transdiagnostic marker of these clinical states. This study evaluates the feasibility of collecting speech samples from people with serious mental illness and explores the potential utility for tracking changes in clinical state over time. Patients (n = 47) were recruited from a community-based mental health clinic with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients used an interactive voice response system for at least 4 months to provide speech samples. Clinic providers (n = 13) reviewed responses and provided global assessment ratings. We computed features of speech and used machine learning to create models of outcome measures trained using either population data or an individual's own data over time. The system was feasible to use, recording 1101 phone calls and 117 hours of speech. Most (92%) of the patients agreed that it was easy to use. The individually-trained models demonstrated the highest correlation with provider ratings (rho = 0.78, p<0.001). Population-level models demonstrated statistically significant correlations with provider global assessment ratings (rho = 0.44, p<0.001), future provider ratings (rho = 0.33, p<0.05), BASIS-24 summary score, depression sub score, and self-harm sub score (rho = 0.25,0.25, and 0.28 respectively; p<0.05), and the SF-12 mental health sub score (rho = 0.25, p<0.05), but not with other BASIS-24 or SF-12 sub scores. This study brings together longitudinal collection of objective behavioral markers along with a transdiagnostic, personalized approach for tracking of mental health clinical state in a community-based clinical setting.

Indexed as

SpeechComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsResidence CharacteristicsSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID31940347
PMCPMC6961853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.