Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940258›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020

Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.

Pamela Souza, Frederick Gallun, Richard Wright

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela SouzaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders and Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Frederick GallunRehabilitation Research and Development National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health and Sciences University.
Richard WrightDepartment of Linguistics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Knowles (United States) · USUniversity of Washington · USVA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

Acoustic and Perceptual Effects of WDRC AmplificationR01DC006014 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOUZA, PAMELA E. · 2005 to 2020
$3.9M
Efficient diagnostic tools to evaluate central auditory dysfunctionR01DC015051 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDDINS, DAVID A., GALLUN, FREDERICK J. · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006014NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose In a previous paper (Souza, Wright, Blackburn, Tatman, & Gallun, 2015), we explored the extent to which individuals with sensorineural hearing loss used different cues for speech identification when multiple cues were available. Specifically, some listeners placed the greatest weight on spectral cues (spectral shape and/or formant transition), whereas others relied on the temporal envelope. In the current study, we aimed to determine whether listeners who relied on temporal envelope did so because they were unable to discriminate the formant information at a level sufficient to use it for identification and the extent to which a brief discrimination test could predict cue weighting patterns. Method Participants were 30 older adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The first task was to label synthetic speech tokens based on the combined percept of temporal envelope rise time and formant transitions. An individual profile was derived from linear discriminant analysis of the identification responses. The second task was to discriminate differences in either temporal envelope rise time or formant transitions. The third task was to discriminate spectrotemporal modulation in a nonspeech stimulus. Results All listeners were able to discriminate temporal envelope rise time at levels sufficient for the identification task. There was wide variability in the ability to discriminate formant transitions, and that ability predicted approximately one third of the variance in the identification task. There was no relationship between performance in the identification task and either amount of hearing loss or ability to discriminate nonspeech spectrotemporal modulation. Conclusions The data suggest that listeners who rely to a greater extent on temporal cues lack the ability to discriminate fine-grained spectral information. The fact that the amount of hearing loss was not associated with the cue profile underscores the need to characterize individual abilities in a more nuanced way than can be captured by the pure-tone audiogram.

Indexed as

Auditory ThresholdCuesSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAudiometry, Pure-ToneFemaleHearing AidsHearing Loss, BilateralHearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeech Discrimination Tests

Identifiers

PMID31940258
PMCPMC7213489
OpenAlexW2999697515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.