Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940239›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Frequency-dependent integration of auditory and vestibular cues for self-motion perception.

Corey S Shayman, Robert J Peterka, Frederick J Gallun, Yonghee Oh, Nai-Yuan N Chang, Timothy E Hullar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. How much I moved: Robust biases in self-rotation perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sustained Loss ofFrontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Corey S ShaymanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-0007
Robert J PeterkaDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Frederick J GallunNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research-VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon.
Yonghee OhDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Nai-Yuan N ChangDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences-Division of Bioengineering and Biomaterials, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Timothy E HullarDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Temporal Synthesis of Vestibular and Extra-Vestibular Sensory SignalsR01DC017425 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI HULLAR, TIMOTHY E, LEWIS, RICHARD F · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence has shown that auditory information may be used to improve postural stability, spatial orientation, navigation, and gait, suggesting an auditory component of self-motion perception. To determine how auditory and other sensory cues integrate for self-motion perception, we measured motion perception during yaw rotations of the body and the auditory environment. Psychophysical thresholds in humans were measured over a range of frequencies (0.1-1.0 Hz) during self-rotation without spatial auditory stimuli, rotation of a sound source around a stationary listener, and self-rotation in the presence of an earth-fixed sound source. Unisensory perceptual thresholds and the combined multisensory thresholds were found to be frequency dependent. Auditory thresholds were better at lower frequencies, and vestibular thresholds were better at higher frequencies. Expressed in terms of peak angular velocity, multisensory vestibular and auditory thresholds ranged from 0.39°/s at 0.1 Hz to 0.95°/s at 1.0 Hz and were significantly better over low frequencies than either the auditory-only (0.54°/s to 2.42°/s at 0.1 and 1.0 Hz, respectively) or vestibular-only (2.00°/s to 0.75°/s at 0.1 and 1.0 Hz, respectively) unisensory conditions. Monaurally presented auditory cues were less effective than binaural cues in lowering multisensory thresholds. Frequency-independent thresholds were derived, assuming that vestibular thresholds depended on a weighted combination of velocity and acceleration cues, whereas auditory thresholds depended on displacement and velocity cues. These results elucidate fundamental mechanisms for the contribution of audition to balance and help explain previous findings, indicating its significance in tasks requiring self-orientation.

Indexed as

AdultAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleMotion PerceptionProprioceptionSensory ThresholdsSound LocalizationSpace PerceptionYoung Adultauditory motionmotion perceptionmultisensory integrationperceptual thresholdvestibular

Identifiers

PMID31940239
PMCPMC7099484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.