Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940122›Full record

ReviewSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020

Breathing retraining in sleep apnoea: a review of approaches and potential mechanisms.

Rosalba Courtney

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rosalba CourtneySouthern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia. rosalba.courtney@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7978-0908
Southern Cross University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnatomically based treatments for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) may not completely resolve OSA. This has led to interest in exploring ways of addressing physiological risk factors. This review examines the literature for research reporting on the effects of various types of breathing training and breathing activities on sleep apnoea. It also reviews and discusses proposed therapeutic mechanisms.

methodsA search of electronic databases was performed using the search terms related to various breathing therapies or to activities requiring high levels of breath control such as singing and the playing of musical instruments and sleep apnoea.

resultsA total of 14 suitable studies were reviewed. A diverse variety of breathing retraining approaches are reported to improve sleep apnoea, e.g., Buteyko method, inspiratory resistance training, and diaphragmatic breathing. There is also a reduced incidence of sleep apnoea with intensive and regular participation in activities that require high levels of breath control, e.g., singing and playing wind instruments. Improvements in sleep-disordered breathing are thought to be related to improvements in (1) muscle tone of the upper airway; (2) respiratory muscle strength; (3) neuroplasticity of breathing control; (4) oxygen levels; (5) hyperventilation/dysfunctional breathing; and (6) autonomic nervous system, metabolic, and inflammatory status.

conclusionBreathing retraining and regular practice of breath control activities such as singing and playing wind instruments are potentially helpful for sleep apnoea, particularly for individuals with minimal anatomical deficit and daytime breathing dysfunction. Research is needed to elucidate mechanisms, to inform patient selection, and to refine clinical protocols.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesHumansRespiratory MusclesSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSleep Apnea SyndromesTreatment OutcomeBreathing retrainingDysfunctional breathingSleep apnoea

Identifiers

PMID31940122
OpenAlexW2999733920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.