Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940096›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2020

Biomarkers and clinical scores to aid the identification of disease severity and intensive care requirement following activation of an in-hospital sepsis code.

Jaume Baldirà, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez, Darius Cameron Wilson, Adolf Ruiz-Sanmartin, Alejandro Cortes, Luis Chiscano, Roser Ferrer-Costa, Inma Comas, Nieves Larrosa, Anna Fàbrega and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06253325 (An Observational Pilot Study for the Multi-Modality Risk Prediction and Early Identification of Critically Ill Septic Patients in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06253325 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Observational Pilot Study for the Multi-Modality Risk Prediction and Early Identification of Critically Ill Septic Patients in the Emergency Department

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSepsisArmsMeasuring tissue oxygenation, Procalcitonin, Mid-regional proadrenomedullin, Hand-held video microscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Update on sepsis treatment.Journal of intensive care · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Developing Augmented Pro-SOFA and Pro-SAPS Models by Integrating Biomarkers PCT, NLR, and CRP with SOFA and SAPS-III Scores.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Time to decision in sepsis.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Circulating MR-proADM levels, as an indicator of endothelial dysfunction, for early risk stratification of mid-term mortality in COVID-19 patients.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaume BaldiràIntensive Care Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan Carlos Ruiz-RodríguezDepartment de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jcruiz@vhebron.net.
Darius Cameron WilsonShock, Organ Dysfunction and Resuscitation Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.
Adolf Ruiz-SanmartinIntensive Care Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro CortesIntensive Care Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis ChiscanoIntensive Care Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Roser Ferrer-CostaBiochemistry Department, Clinical Laboratories, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Inma ComasBiochemistry Department, Clinical Laboratories, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Nieves LarrosaMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna FàbregaMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan José González-LópezMicrobiology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricard FerrerDepartment de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew validated biomarker or clinical score combinations exist which can discriminate between cases of infection and other non-infectious conditions following activation of an in-hospital sepsis code, as well as provide an accurate severity assessment of the corresponding host response. This study aimed to identify suitable blood biomarker (MR-proADM, PCT, CRP and lactate) or clinical score (SOFA and APACHE II) combinations to address this unmet clinical need.

methodsA prospective, observational study of patients activating the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital sepsis code (ISC) within the emergency department (ED), hospital wards and intensive care unit (ICU). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, logistic and Cox regression analysis were used to assess performance.

results148 patients fulfilled the Vall d'Hebron ISC criteria, of which 130 (87.8%) were retrospectively found to have a confirmed diagnosis of infection. Both PCT and MR-proADM had a moderate-to-high performance in discriminating between infected and non-infected patients following ISC activation, although the optimal PCT cut-off varied significantly across departments. Similarly, MR-proADM and SOFA performed well in predicting 28- and 90-day mortality within the total infected patient population, as well as within patients presenting with a community-acquired infection or following a medical emergency or prior surgical procedure. Importantly, MR-proADM also showed a high association with the requirement for ICU admission after ED presentation [OR (95% CI) 8.18 (1.75-28.33)] or during treatment on the ward [OR (95% CI) 3.64 (1.43-9.29)], although the predictive performance of all biomarkers and clinical scores diminished between both settings.

conclusionsResults suggest that the individual use of PCT and MR-proADM might help to accurately identify patients with infection and assess the overall severity of the host response, respectively. In addition, the use of MR-proADM could accurately identify patients requiring admission onto the ICU, irrespective of whether patients presented to the ED or were undergoing treatment on the ward. Initial measurement of both biomarkers might therefore facilitate early treatment strategies following activation of an in-hospital sepsis code.

Identifiers

PMID31940096
PMCPMC6962418
OpenAlexW3005450232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.