Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940088›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2020

A review on colorimetric methods for determination of organophosphate pesticides using gold and silver nanoparticles.

I S Che Sulaiman, B W Chieng, M J Osman, K K Ong, J I A Rashid, W M Z Wan Yunus, S A M Noor, N A M Kasim, N A Halim, A Mohamad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Improved Spectrophotometric Method for Toluene-4-Monooxygenase Activity.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I S Che SulaimanResearch Centre for Chemical Defence, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
B W ChiengResearch Centre for Chemical Defence, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
M J OsmanDepartment of Chemistry and Biology, Centre for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
K K OngResearch Centre for Chemical Defence, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ongkhim@upnm.edu.my.
J I A RashidDepartment of Chemistry and Biology, Centre for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
W M Z Wan YunusCentre for Tropicalisation, National Defence University of Malaysia, Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
S A M NoorDepartment of Chemistry and Biology, Centre for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
N A M KasimResearch Centre for Chemical Defence, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
N A HalimDepartment of Chemistry and Biology, Centre for Defence Foundation Studies, National Defence University of Malaysia, Sungai Besi Camp, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
A MohamadCentre of Foundation Studies for Agricultural Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
National Defence University of Malaysia · MYUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MY

Funding

Ministry of Education Malaysia UPNM/2018/CHEMDEF/ST/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review (with 99 refs.) summarizes the progress that has been made in colorimetric (i.e. spectrophotometric) determination of organophosphate pesticides (OPPs) using gold and silver nanoparticles (NPs). Following an introduction into the field, a first large section covers the types and functions of organophosphate pesticides. Methods for colorimetric (spectrophotometric) measurements including RGB techniques are discussed next. A further section covers the characteristic features of gold and silver-based NPs. Syntheses and modifications of metal NPs are covered in section 5. This is followed by overviews on enzyme inhibition-based assays, aptamer-based assays and chemical (non-enzymatic) assays, and a discussion of specific features of colorimetric assays. Several Tables are presented that give an overview on the wealth of methods and materials. A concluding section addresses current challenges and discusses potential future trends and opportunities. Graphical abstractSchematic representation of organophosphate pesticide determinations based on aggregation of nanoparticles (particular silver or gold nanoparticles). This leads to a color change which can be determined visually and monitored by a red shift in the absorption spectrum.

Indexed as

AnimalsAptamers, NucleotideBiosensing TechniquesColorimetryFood ContaminationGoldHumansMetal NanoparticlesOrganophosphatesPesticidesSilverWater Pollutants, ChemicalAptamers, NucleotideGoldOrganophosphatesPesticidesSilverWater Pollutants, ChemicalAggregationAssayDeaggregationGold nanoparticlesSilver nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID31940088
OpenAlexW2999460409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.