ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021
[Ethical implications in the therapeutic management of dehydrated patients at the end of life].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ethical framework for fluid management in the palliative care setting can vary.
objectivesWhat are the relevant ethical implications related to dehydration during end-of-life care and what are the special requirements we need to consider as far as "terminal dehydration" is concerned? MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles published in English and German.
resultsOur inferences represent an attitude rather than an evidence-based position-a fact that is due to the underlying normative and ethical references which are hardly amenable to statistical evaluation. As far as ethical considerations are concerned, evidence is lacking to support clear decision-making and, thus, does not justify moving away from established concepts of clinically assisted hydration (CAH) at the end of life as long as measures can be effectually implemented.
conclusionsDehydration must not be considered a measure to hasten death. Hence, dehydration in the palliative care setting must be regarded a "symptom" that should be "controlled" if it can be corrected by therapeutic means and if the patient's will does not contradict that approach. However, if CAH is futile, it is justified to refuse or stop it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31940062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.