Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31940042›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Longitudinal Assessment of Resident Performance Using Entrustable Professional Activities.

Daniel J Schumacher, Daniel C West, Alan Schwartz, Su-Ting Li, Leah Millstein, Elena C Griego, Teri Turner, Bruce E Herman, Robert Englander, Joni Hemond and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Great Expansion: Are We on the Verge of a Psychiatry Program Bubble?Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Daniel J SchumacherDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Daniel C WestDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alan SchwartzDepartment of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Su-Ting LiDepartment of Pediatrics at the University of California Davis Health, Sacramento.
Leah MillsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Elena C GriegoDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Teri TurnerDepartment of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
Bruce E HermanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Robert EnglanderDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
Joni HemondDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Valera HudsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Georgia/Augusta University, Augusta.
Lauren NewhallDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Georgia/Augusta University, Augusta.
Kenya McNeal TriceDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Julie BaughnDepartment of Pediatrics, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota.
Erin GiudiceDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Hannah FamigliettiDepartment of Pediatrics, New York University, New York.
Jonathan TolentinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Kimberly GiffordDepartment of Pediatrics, Dartmouth University, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Carol CarraccioAmerican Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Association of Pediatric Program Directors Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network General Pediatrics Entrustable Professional Activities Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are an emerging workplace-based, patient-oriented assessment approach with limited empirical evidence. Objective: To measure the development of pediatric trainees' clinical skills over time using EPA-based assessment data. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of categorical pediatric residents over 3 academic years (2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018) assessed on 17 American Board of Pediatrics EPAs. Residents in training at 23 pediatric residency programs in the Association of Pediatric Program Directors Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network were included. Assessment was conducted by clinical competency committee members, who made summative assessment decisions regarding levels of supervision required for each resident and each EPA. Data were collected from May 2016 to November 2018 and analyzed from November to December 2018. Interventions: Longitudinal, prospective assessment using EPAs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trajectories of supervision levels by EPA during residency training and how often graduating residents were deemed ready for unsupervised practice in each EPA. Results: Across the 5 data collection cycles, 1987 residents from all 3 postgraduate years in 23 residency programs were assigned 25 503 supervision level reports for the 17 general pediatrics EPAs. The 4 EPAs that required the most supervision across training were EPA 14 (quality improvement) on the 5-level scale (estimated mean level at graduation, 3.7; 95% CI, 3.6-3.7) and EPAs 8 (transition to adult care; mean, 7.0; 95% CI, 7.0-7.1), 9 (behavioral and mental health; mean, 6.6; 95% CI, 6.5-6.6), and 10 (resuscitate and stabilize; mean, 6.9; 95% CI, 6.8-7.0) on the expanded 5-level scale. At the time of graduation (36 months), the percentage of trainees who were rated at a supervision level corresponding to "unsupervised practice" varied by EPA from 53% to 98%. If performance standards were set to align with 90% of trainees achieving the level of unsupervised practice, this standard would be met for only 8 of the 17 EPAs (although 89% met this standard for EPA 17, performing the common procedures of the general pediatrician). Conclusions and Relevance: This study presents initial evidence for empirically derived practice readiness and sets the stage for identifying curricular gaps that contribute to discrepancy between observed practice readiness and standards needed to produce physicians able to meet the health needs of the patient populations they serve. Future work should compare these findings with postgraduation outcomes data as a means of seeking validity evidence.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationCurriculumFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyLongitudinal StudiesMalePediatricsProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31940042
PMCPMC6991321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.