Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31939783›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2020

Alive and Ventilator Free: A Hierarchical, Composite Outcome for Clinical Trials in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Victor Novack, Jeremy R Beitler, Maayan Yitshak-Sade, B Taylor Thompson, David A Schoenfeld, Gordon Rubenfeld, Daniel Talmor, Samuel M Brown

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Refining normoxemia targets in acute burn care: Reply.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2026
    Article
  11. Optimizing endpoints in early phase clinical trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The times are changing: A primer on novel clinical trial designs and endpoints in critical care research.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor NovackClinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Jeremy R BeitlerCenter for Acute Respiratory Failure and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Maayan Yitshak-SadeClinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel.
B Taylor ThompsonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
David A SchoenfeldBiostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Gordon RubenfeldSunnybrook Hospital Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daniel TalmorDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Samuel M BrownDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center and University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · USSoroka Medical Center · IL

Funding

Sub Project 2UM1HL108724 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LORING, STEPHEN H, TALMOR, DANIEL STUART · 2012 to 2014
$4.6M
Long Term Outcomes and Macrophage Biology in Patients with EVALIU01HL123018 · NHLBI · IHC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. · PI BLEDSOE, JOSEPH R, BROWN, SAMUEL MORRIS · 2014 to 2020
$2.4M
Breath stacking dyssynchrony in acute respiratory distress syndromeK23HL133489 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BEITLER, JEREMY R. · 2017 to 2021
$871k
Measuring lung stress to identify occult ventilation-induced lung injury in ARDSR21HL145506 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BEITLER, JEREMY R. · 2019 to 2020
$243k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133489NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL145506NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL123018NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL108724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSurvival from acute respiratory distress syndrome is improving, and outcomes beyond mortality may be important for testing new treatments. The "ventilator-free days" score, is an established composite that equates ventilation on day 28 to death. A hierarchical outcome treating death as a worse than prolonged ventilation would enhance face validity, but performance characteristics and reporting of such an outcome are unknown. We therefore evaluated the performance of a novel hierarchical composite endpoint, the Alive and Ventilator Free score.

designUsing data from four Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network clinical trials, we compared Alive and Ventilator Free to the ventilator-free days score. Alive and Ventilator Free compares each patient with every other patient in a win-lose-tie for each comparison. Duration of mechanical ventilation is only compared if both patients survived. We evaluated power of Alive and Ventilator Free versus ventilator-free days score under various circumstances.

settingICUs within the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. PATIENTS: Individuals enrolled in four Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network trials.

interventionsNone for this analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWithin the four trials (n = 2,410 patients), Alive and Ventilator Free and ventilator-free days score had similar power, with Alive and Ventilator Free slightly more powerful when a mortality difference was present, and ventilator-free days score slightly more powerful with a difference in duration of mechanical ventilation. Alive and Ventilator Free less often found in favor of treatments that increased mortality and increased days free of ventilation among survivors.

conclusionsA hierarchical composite endpoint, Alive and Ventilator Free, preserves statistical power while improving face validity. Alive and Ventilator Free is less prone to favor a treatment with discordant effects on survival and days free of ventilation. This general approach can support complex outcome hierarchies with multiple constituent outcomes. Approaches to interpretation of differences in Alive and Ventilator Free are also presented.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsHumansIntensive Care UnitsResearch DesignRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID31939783
PMCPMC6986198
OpenAlexW2985938878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.