Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31939557›Full record

ReviewClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2020

Type 2 diabetes mellitus-related environmental factors and the gut microbiota: emerging evidence and challenges.

Yanfen Liu, Xueyong Lou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Relationships between Diabetes and the Intestinal Microbial Population.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Chemical Compounds and Ambient Factors Affecting Pancreatic Alpha-Cells Mass and Function: What Evidence?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dynamic of Glucose Homeostasis in Virtual Patients: A Comparison between Different Behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Current Strategies, Unfocussed Aspects, Challenges, and Alternatives.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanfen LiuJinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Department of Endocrinology Jinhua, 321000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7259-6251
Xueyong LouJinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Department of Endocrinology Jinhua, 321000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-3156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota is a group of over 38 trillion bacterial cells in the human microbiota that plays an important role in the regulation of human metabolism through its symbiotic relationship with the host. Changes in the gut microbial ecosystem are associated with increased susceptibility to metabolic disease in humans. However, the composition of the gut microbiota in those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases is not well understood. This article reviews the relationship between environmental factors and the gut microbiota in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Finally, we discuss the goal of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by modifying the gut microbiota and the challenges that remain in this area.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EcosystemGastrointestinal TractHumansMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID31939557
PMCPMC6945290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.